w3dd1e

I don’t have all the details to the case, but after reading the article I kinda think they got it wrong.

Let that man call himself Lambo and keep the domain. As long as he isn’t pretending to represent another brand, such as Lamborghini.

That’s why Walmart is switching to digital pricing so they can change prices on the fly.

I think the headline is a little misleading.

My gut reaction was the same as yours, but after reading the article I don’t think they are far off.

$140,000 for a family of four in certain locations could be doing very poorly.

After taxes, it’s about $110,000 a year. According to a few sits I found when seaching, the per year cost of a child varies by state. In NY, it’s approx $30k per year. So, for a family of four with two kids that $50k-60k a year.

That leaves about $60k a year. Housing costs in NY is approx $4.3k a month for a 3br house. . That’s $51,600 a year.

You now have $8,400 left for the utilities, food, clothing, etc.

The current federal poverty level is roughly $30k/yr which is basically impossible to make work.

deleted by creator

Texas is badly gerrymandered. It’s a big hill to climb.

I wasn’t sure if that applies to non-citizens.

Personally, I think it should, but laws aren’t always just.

Without a warrant, CBP wasn’t entitled to anything on his phone and they can go fuck themselves.

Movies made us think it was a high tech procedure that required a lot of planning.

Apparently, smash and grab works best?

Good. I want them to know. I want everyone to know that ICE is a bunch of limp dick nazis.

1 Fire all the people in the Office of Civil Rights. 2 Deploy a bunch of ICE assholes to violate civil rights. 3 Receive record number of complaints 4 Rehire fired people. 5 Clear caseload. 6 Repeat step 1 7 ??? 8 Profit.

Yeah! I saw reporting on this months ago.

What I appreciated about this article was the detail about how they tried to hide it.

Also I love GN. Thanks for sharing!

That’s interesting. I’ll need to look it up.

I never really watched LTT even before the controversy. The story about the woman who moved to Canada to work there then got fucked over kinda turned me off so I started avoiding them. Something about it just felt icky but maybe I’m wrong about that.

I tried watching MKBHD but something about him feels off too.

Maybe I’m the problem.

It’s the confusion between and LLM and AI.

LLMs are just algorithms that understand language. They don’t really think for themselves. They just search the database of stolen ideas and try to apply it.

But we all use those words interchangeably they basically mean the same thing.

Did we just become best friends?

Frenchman Joseph-Ignace Guillotin solved this problem in the 18th century.

I love Ed. He is the personification of my emotions.

Don’t say AI found it, just an algorithm caught it.

Could have been as simple as a spreadsheet highlighting cells with a ratio that was below a threshold.

Article didn’t say what software was used.

Edit: I meant “didn’t say”. Autocorrect has been really going after me lately.

The article said it was an algorithm that detected it, not AI.

Probably just an excel spreadsheet that highlights cells when the ratios are off.

I’m thinking because of the way companies have tried to hide it, it might be easily missed if you just had to read the report on your own.

This headline is a bit misleading. The article also says that only 2/3 of the errors GPT found were verified errors (according to the author).

• Overall, ChatGPT identified 56 supposed errors in these 31 featured articles.

• I confirmed 38 of these (i.e. 68%) as valid errors in my assessment. Implemented corrections for 35 of these, and Agreed with 3 additional ones without yet implementing a correction myself. Disagreed with 13 of the alleged errors (23%).

• I rated 4 as** Inconclusive** (7%), and one as  Not Applicable (in the sense that ChatGPT’s observation appeared factually correct but would only have implied an error in case that part of the article was intended in a particular way, a possibility that the ChatGPT response had acknowledged explicitly).

That and the thing where GamerNexus caught them benchmarking incorrectly, then selling off prototypes that they didn’t pay for. It’s not a good look for their integrity.

GN found a bunch of other errors but LTT won’t retest because of the aforementioned selling off prototypes they were given.