While I’m generally pro regulation, that’s not true. You can absolutely over regulate an industry or put out regulations that are bad.
For example NIMBY regulations that prevent multi-family units from being constructed or in NJ breweries can’t sell food (due to weird alcohol laws/regulations).
I’ve also argued if it’s that’s the case, then just pay for all Americans to be “pre-screened” and get rid of 80% of the TSA. That would have to save a huge amount of money.
But TSA is most likely a mixture of a jobs program and easy way to send people kickbacks.
All of them. If you’re seeing sources cited, it means it’s a RAG (LLM with extra bits). The extra bits make a big difference as it means the response is limited to a select few points of reference and isn’t comparing all known knowledge on a subject matter.
Thanks for the details, seems like that may be why the older Chromecasts are still supported.
I’m aware, I was just pointing out that Costco is more of a household name (and much larger company).
Costco is apparently the third largest retailer in the world. . So it’s a slightly bigger deal when they sue over the tariffs.
I didn’t say they weren’t known, just that Costco is certainly the most known (for the US). If you just look at revenue Kawasaki has 5% of the footprint of Costco and Revlon hasn’t posted anything since it’s bankruptcy in 2023 (from what I could find). Revenue might not directly relate to if a company is a household name, but I think it gives a general sense.
Also, I was just noting that Costco is a bigger name. All the companies listed are notable.
From the bottom of the article:
Global cosmetics giant Revlon, eyeglass maker EssilorLuxottica, motorcycle manufacturer Kawasaki, canned foods seller Bumble Bee, Japanese auto supplier Yokohama Tire and many smaller firms have also filed similar suits.
That probably does make Costco the most “known” company to sue.
I thought for Chromecast the “casting” part is just telling the Chromecast what to play. Do you need your phone on while Chromecast shows content?
I mean, if you go back 100 years in the US, there has always been some inflation (as that’s how our economic model works). The cost of living crisis isn’t caused by inflation, but larger macro economic policies.
Source: https://www.usinflationcalculator.com/inflation/historical-inflation-rates/
It’s not nonsense, we’ve seen deflation destroy economies plenty of times.
The issue is that what economists are saying is don’t ask/expect lower prices, demand higher wages. Higher wages produce basically the same result without breaking the economic system.
Maybe you want the economic system to break, but for most people that would be bad and lead to a lot of death and suffering.
Yeah, I think it’s the combination of things. Breaking personal property is pretty much universally frowned upon, and if he’s breaking car windows he was just as likely to hit a person.
Not sure if that’s enough to be deported, but it wouldn’t be an outrageous outcome even in the past.