But you don’t know what among these options have already been tried. You can’t just force someone to move to a different facility unless they have a guardian, and I can only assume this woman does not have a guardian and has capacity to make her own decisions. Again, we do not have the information necessary to draw a legitimate moral judgment for or against this facility

Ok, let’s roll with it then. What would be your solution in this hypothetical situation that avoids removing her from the premises?

https://mander.xyz/comment/23783525

It’s easy to take a black and white stance like “this is never okay,” but reality is never that clear cut. What if she was exhibiting behaviors that put other residents at risk? Should the long term care facility just put up with her and risk the safety of other residents, or should they take steps to remove her? This is just one of many possibilities that are not black and white. Again, we have literally no info to go off of, and we won’t because this woman’s situation is protected health information.

It’s impossible to make a moral argument with so little information. Again, we’re presented here with a screenshot of a tweet. We have no idea what actually transpired here

This story is very confusing, and I can only assume it’s not as cut and dry as this screenshot of a tweet would have us believe. Being evicted because you can’t pay your rent and being evicted because you decided to stop paying your rent are genuinely two different things

“It’s an ambitious goal.”

What. The. Fuck. AP, you can find much better journalism than this

Definitely sounds like a media play based in lies. Too bad about this god awful AP headline

The assignment was for a psychology class about lifespan development. Students were asked to write a 650-word response to an academic study that examined whether conformity with gender norms was associated with popularity or bullying among middle school students.

The essays were graded out of 25 points, broken down by whether the student demonstrated an understanding of the article and addressed a specific aspect of the argument put forth. Fulnecky received zero points for her work.

"Please note that I am not deducting points because you have certain beliefs,” the instructor wrote in feedback obtained by The Oklahoman. Instead, the instructor said the paper did “not answer the questions for the assignment.”

I just read up a bit on the CPRA. I’m gathering that it at least was a pretty decent civilian watchdog under Mac Muir, however he resigned back in February due to budget cuts. Their website hasn’t even been updated with that info, so I have little hope.

Costco paid the tariffs

The article is literally about Costco. They throw in a single line at the very end about some other companies.

Ok? This article is about Costco

Hello from 3 months ago. What does this Brazilian dude have to do with anything Nepalese. And what is his name? You don’t even mention it

I seriously doubt walking would be the most deadly with this metric. Just anecdotally in my city, there are way more fatalities due to motor vehicle collisions than due to MV-pedestrian collisions, and a ton of people walk around every day

You’re not the person I asked unless you forgot to switch alts, but you also didn’t answer the question. What is it you (and the other guy) do like?

What is it you do like? You seem to hate everything

How can you blame the entire party for the actions of a few? Most Democrats, establishment and otherwise, seem really upset by what those senators have done

…as evidenced by?