I do not really have a body for this. I was not aware that this is a thing and still feel like this is bs, but maybe there is an actual explanation for HDMI Forum’s decision that I am missing.

  • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    2 days ago

    AMD should remove the HDMI port from all of their GPUs as a nice F.U. to the HDMI forum. They shouldn’t be paying the licensing fees if they are not allowed to make full use of the hardware.

      • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        2 days ago

        There would be uproar, but like the audio jack on phones people would come around. All it would take is one big enough company to pull it off, and the rest would follow.

        • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Apple could remove the audio jack from iPhones because 1. They’re Apple. They could remove the eyes from their customers and 9/10ths of them would stay loyal. and 2. Eliminating the headphone jack mostly locked people out of $20 or less earbuds that might have come free with a previous phone anyway. People grumbled, and carried on using the Bluetooth headphones a lot of them already owned.

          AMD doesn’t have the following that Apple does; they’re the objectively worse but more affordable alternative to Nvidia. Eliminating the HDMI port would lock themselves out of the HTPC market entirely; anyone who wanted to connect a PC to a TV would find their products impossible to use, not without experience ruining adapter dongles. We’re talking about making machines that cost hundreds or thousands of dollars incompatible.

          • Zaemz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Considering most gaming consoles use AMD hardware, they’d be having to keep up on licensing for those products as well.

        • Jarix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Just bought a new phone that has an audio jack. Some of us refuse to “come around”. They can fit a stylus and an audio jack in this thing. Why did they remove the audio jack again? Not enough room? Bullshit

          • NominatedNemesis@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            21 hours ago

            Can I ask what phone did you buy? Only if you confortable to share it ofc. I am looking for a new one. I loved my Samsung Note9. Everything was great, it had stylus, jack, battery life, oled screen, decent cameras. The only thing missing is andoid OS update support. It still better than most middle range phones…

          • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            2 days ago

            The point isn’t whether it’s needed or not. It’s not about space or features. The point is that a major player made a design decision and bucked the system. And while there may still be some phones with audio jacks, the majority of mainstream phones don’t. That major player is still successful, and other companies followed suit.

            Can we agree this is what should happen to HDMI. No?

          • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            tbh I looked at audio jacks in internals, and they do usually have double the footprint on a pcb than what you see outside of it, at least on low end consumer devices:

            That’s not to say that they couldn’t put anything more compact in a highend device like a smart phone.

            • Jarix@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Okay but I have a usbc slot, speakers, stylus, and an audio jack all on the bottom of my new phone. It’s bullshit that they needed the room as evidenced by this 2025 phone.

              It can also use an sdcard. Greedy fucking corporations just wanting you to repurchase stuff you already have.

              • moopet@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                There are sane reasons to ditch an audio port. Like, physical connectors are fragile. Why use something that’s so often broken, when you don’t need to? Why include circuitry for something that you don’t need? At this point, physical audio ports are there for backwards compatibility. I’m not saying wired headphones are bad - I have wired headphones - but phones are the least useful place for them.

                • Jarix@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  None of those reasons are the reasons that were stated for removing it from devices by the manufacturers.

      • Seefra 1@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        For now, but DP and specially DP over USB-C is becoming gradually more popular for computer hardware, someone paying 400 euros for a GPU doesn’t mind paying 10 bucks extra on an adapter if they have an HDMI monitor. But most monitors nowadays come with DP anyway.