The HDMI Forum, responsible for the HDMI specification, continues to stonewall open source. Valve’s Steam Machine theoretically supports HDMI 2.1, but the mini-PC is software-limited to HDMI 2.0. As a result, more than 60 frames per second at 4K resolution are only possible with limitations.

  • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Why though? It’s immediately clear where a VGA or hdmi cable works, but a USB-C could support or not support anything.

    • galaxy_nova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      So could an hdmi cable, there a lots of different hdmi specs as there are usb c specs. The problem is the lack of standardized labeling not the cables shapes. USB-C for everything would personally be my preference

      • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        You also need cable markings, as both the cable and the port decide what specs to implement, and if they’re standard compliant or not.

        Plus there are active/inactive cables for thunderbolt (and I think usb4) which massively affect performance.

        USB c is better than the shitty port designs of USB before it, but it’s a huge mess.