brianpeiris@lemmy.ca to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agoNo AI* Here - A Response to Mozilla's Next Chapter - Waterfox Blogwww.waterfox.comexternal-linkmessage-square122linkfedilinkarrow-up1588arrow-down113
arrow-up1575arrow-down1external-linkNo AI* Here - A Response to Mozilla's Next Chapter - Waterfox Blogwww.waterfox.combrianpeiris@lemmy.ca to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square122linkfedilink
minus-squareonehundredsixtynine@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down3·3 days ago All these teams cannot maintain their own browser engine False.
minus-squareyistdaj@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·9 hours agoPale Moon is criticied precisly because its developers don’t have the resources to keep it fast, feature complete and secure.
minus-squareAllero@lemmy.todaycakelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·3 days agoInteresting, though Goanna is still a Gecko fork.
minus-squarenyan@lemmy.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 days agoIt is, but it’s so divergent these days that 90% of Mozilla patches won’t even apply to the codebase (and presumably vice-versa). My conclusion is that Pale Moon and Goanna are capable of surviving if Firefox development ceases.
False.
Pale Moon is criticied precisly because its developers don’t have the resources to keep it fast, feature complete and secure.
Interesting, though Goanna is still a Gecko fork.
It is, but it’s so divergent these days that 90% of Mozilla patches won’t even apply to the codebase (and presumably vice-versa). My conclusion is that Pale Moon and Goanna are capable of surviving if Firefox development ceases.
I see