I mean I feel like it’s still an inarguable point as to WHY she was shot, but let’s ignore even that part but why oh why did they deny her care after that? Can conservative sociopaths explain that part away, because they’ll always argue about how she deserved it but did she deserve medical care?
Because at least actual cops still call an ambulance for you or let a Dr reach you
There are times cops have shot someone 30 or more times, who is clearly absolutely dead and they will still apply bandages and give CPR sometimes to give at least the impression of protecting life. To me the denial of medical care in this situation is even more proof of guilt than the shooting because they can argue they feared for their life in the moment, but they had ample time to provide aid and deliberately blocked it.
The murderer even went to check the body immediately after but then left, I would be unsurprised if he saw she was still potentially alive and they decided to block aid intentionally to make sure she was dead. I assumed she was shot in the face or head 3 or 4 times which would be unlikely to survive, but apparently she was wounded twice in the chest on the right side, once in the forearm and once in the head. I don’t know the specific damage from the shot to the head, it’s most likely she would have at least been in a vegetative state or have severe brain damage if she had lived, but to deny the chance of any aid for over ten minutes would seal the deal of a conviction for murder if I were a jury member in this case.
It’s not even a stretch of the imagination to come to the idea that they’d say, “she disobeyed, therefore she deserved to die”.
They eagerly dehumanize anybody who diverges from their strict ideals. Remember how Kristi Noem admitted to shooting her dog dead because it behaved like the big untrained puppy that it was? She told that story because they believe that is a reasonable response to an untrained, young and full of energy dog being disobedient.
In their mind, Renee Good was no better and deserved no better than that dog.
First, you don’t know that that guy really is a doctor.
Not an acceptable reason. I’d actually expect that medical personnel probably do in fact carry some sort of documentation that identifies them as such, likely for this very reason.
Second, if she lives, she can sue.
So…they want 1st degree murder rather than manslaughter charges. Actively blocking medical aid demonstrates explicit premeditated intent.
I mean I feel like it’s still an inarguable point as to WHY she was shot, but let’s ignore even that part but why oh why did they deny her care after that? Can conservative sociopaths explain that part away, because they’ll always argue about how she deserved it but did she deserve medical care?
Because at least actual cops still call an ambulance for you or let a Dr reach you
There are times cops have shot someone 30 or more times, who is clearly absolutely dead and they will still apply bandages and give CPR sometimes to give at least the impression of protecting life. To me the denial of medical care in this situation is even more proof of guilt than the shooting because they can argue they feared for their life in the moment, but they had ample time to provide aid and deliberately blocked it.
The murderer even went to check the body immediately after but then left, I would be unsurprised if he saw she was still potentially alive and they decided to block aid intentionally to make sure she was dead. I assumed she was shot in the face or head 3 or 4 times which would be unlikely to survive, but apparently she was wounded twice in the chest on the right side, once in the forearm and once in the head. I don’t know the specific damage from the shot to the head, it’s most likely she would have at least been in a vegetative state or have severe brain damage if she had lived, but to deny the chance of any aid for over ten minutes would seal the deal of a conviction for murder if I were a jury member in this case.
Comment above says 2 chest, one arm
If it turns out the shot to the face was bullet two or three, Ross is done.
It’s not even a stretch of the imagination to come to the idea that they’d say, “she disobeyed, therefore she deserved to die”.
They eagerly dehumanize anybody who diverges from their strict ideals. Remember how Kristi Noem admitted to shooting her dog dead because it behaved like the big untrained puppy that it was? She told that story because they believe that is a reasonable response to an untrained, young and full of energy dog being disobedient.
In their mind, Renee Good was no better and deserved no better than that dog.
Plus, she was a mouthy lesbian with a wife mouthing off, too. And she was supposedly an ACTIVIST. How dare she!
The ICE “officer” naturally had no other choice but to summarily execute her on the street as judge, jury and executioner.
Two reasons. First, you don’t know that that guy really is a doctor. He could be some random crazy person. Second, if she lives, she can sue.
Funny, we don’t know that masked thugs are actually ICE agents.
Not making excuses for a fascist preventing a doctor from getting to someone who’s bleeding to death is free.
Not making snarky comments is also free. They asked why, I answered. I never said it was a good reason or any excuse.
Removed by mod
That never happens, also the response isn’t “no” it’s any sort of question to discern if they are telling the truth.
Not an acceptable reason. I’d actually expect that medical personnel probably do in fact carry some sort of documentation that identifies them as such, likely for this very reason.
So…they want 1st degree murder rather than manslaughter charges. Actively blocking medical aid demonstrates
explicitpremeditated intent.Second degree is intent without premeditation.
My bad. Fixed it above.
Removed by mod
Who the fuck cares if he’s a real Doctor? You afraid he’s gonna hurt her more than a shot to the head?