• Vincent@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 days ago

    Reading the article, I think at least to oppose centralised players that DoS the internet, congest our electricity infrastructure and pollute the environment, and try to bypass democracy through regulatory capture. That captures quite a few of the dark sides of the current AI hype that I’m unhappy about, so let’s hope that works out.

    • eleijeep@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      How do they propose to fight bot-crawlers, environmental damage and regulatory capture by creating more AI?

      • Vincent@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Steelmanning the argument, I’d say: you could outcompete the companies doing those things, e.g. by giving people AI that runs on their device and is ethically trained.

        It might seem hard to compete at the moment, but given that there’d be no costs to running them, I don’t think it’s necessarily impossible: even if the quality is lower, it’s very hard to beat free.

        Hopefully, if the OpenAIs of this world go bankrupt, they’ll stop hammering, say, OpenStreetMap.

      • XLE@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        The only alternative to bad AI is, according to Mozilla, more AI. But good AI, wholesome AI. With more guardrails, so the stormtroopers stop falling off catwalks.