Oh, you’re one of those. So when you say “credible source,” what you really mean is “source I already agree with.” Meaning that, to you, there is no credible source. I guess that means no, there is no proof that will satisfy you. Cool. You’ve just religioned your way into unfalsifiability, I guess.
you’re switching accounts again
Sure, believe what you want to believe. Clearly I have multiple sock puppet accounts on Lemmy to have random arguments with people about whether or not Russia did something to affect the US Presidential Election. I can’t honestly comprehend why you think I might be doing that.
You’re the one making claims and referring to known liars and regime mouthpieces of the US press.
I’m European, I don’t rely on your gutter level regime press or their ridiculous claims.
there is no proof that will satisfy you.
Really it’s not that difficult, ANY PROOF will satisfy me, as is common in discussions.
“sources say”, “it is believed” or whatever cheap tricks your press uses to make baseless claims are NOT PROOF.
I know americans swallow a lot of garbage and ‘trust me bro’ is enough for them but that doesn’t work for me.
I require standards and PROOF.
You will fail any time when called out on your BS, as you all did now.
None of you have provided me with any proof.
Embarrassing.
I’ve provided proof, as you’ve defined it. You may actually need to click through a link or two to find it, but nothing I’ve provided is “sources” or “believed.” It’s emails, official documents, products of formal investigations. Is it perfect? No! But it’s what we have, and it’s honestly enough.
But since you seem hell-bent on raking me over the coals for having the audacity to believe that a known bad actor is influencing American elections, I guess we’re done here.
Oh, you’re one of those. So when you say “credible source,” what you really mean is “source I already agree with.” Meaning that, to you, there is no credible source. I guess that means no, there is no proof that will satisfy you. Cool. You’ve just religioned your way into unfalsifiability, I guess.
Sure, believe what you want to believe. Clearly I have multiple sock puppet accounts on Lemmy to have random arguments with people about whether or not Russia did something to affect the US Presidential Election. I can’t honestly comprehend why you think I might be doing that.
LOL at “you’re one of those.”
You’re the one making claims and referring to known liars and regime mouthpieces of the US press.
I’m European, I don’t rely on your gutter level regime press or their ridiculous claims.
Really it’s not that difficult, ANY PROOF will satisfy me, as is common in discussions.
“sources say”, “it is believed” or whatever cheap tricks your press uses to make baseless claims are NOT PROOF.
I know americans swallow a lot of garbage and ‘trust me bro’ is enough for them but that doesn’t work for me.
I require standards and PROOF. You will fail any time when called out on your BS, as you all did now.
None of you have provided me with any proof.
Embarrassing.
I’ve provided proof, as you’ve defined it. You may actually need to click through a link or two to find it, but nothing I’ve provided is “sources” or “believed.” It’s emails, official documents, products of formal investigations. Is it perfect? No! But it’s what we have, and it’s honestly enough.
But since you seem hell-bent on raking me over the coals for having the audacity to believe that a known bad actor is influencing American elections, I guess we’re done here.
You people are hilarious.
Thanks for the fun times, you can end the humiliation and weasel out.