return2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 11 days agoLawmakers suggest at least a half-dozen men are being protected by over-redactions in Epstein filesedition.cnn.comexternal-linkmessage-square30linkfedilinkarrow-up1345arrow-down11
arrow-up1344arrow-down1external-linkLawmakers suggest at least a half-dozen men are being protected by over-redactions in Epstein filesedition.cnn.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 11 days agomessage-square30linkfedilink
minus-squarecrapwittyname@feddit.uklinkfedilinkarrow-up5·11 days agoAm I being dense to assume that one of the six names is “Donald J Trump”? Why would he not be one of the names?
minus-squareZephyrXero@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·11 days agoIt was 6 new names, Trump was already well documented before
minus-squarefizzle@quokk.aulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·10 days agoThe 6 names apparently had no obvious reason to be redacted. Trump’s reasons for redaction are obvious.
minus-squarephutatorius@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up2·10 days agoTrump’s name appears at least 1 million times in the “unredacted” (less redacted) files.
Am I being dense to assume that one of the six names is “Donald J Trump”? Why would he not be one of the names?
It was 6 new names, Trump was already well documented before
The 6 names apparently had no obvious reason to be redacted. Trump’s reasons for redaction are obvious.
Trump’s name appears at least 1 million times in the “unredacted” (less redacted) files.