A father is suing Google and Alphabet, alleging its Gemini chatbot reinforced his son’s delusional belief it was his AI wife and coached him toward suicide and a planned airport attack.
AI’s can’t have conversations any more than a book can. It may appear that way, but there is nobody there to have that conversation. More like flipping through a choose your own adventure book.
AI’s can’t have conversations any more than a book can. It may appear that way, but there is nobody there to have that conversation. More like flipping through a choose your own adventure book.
How is that pedantic point relevant?
How is it not?
What difference does it make if you call it a conversation or whatever you would call it? The LLM responded to his messages with its own messages.
Arguing semantics of what counts as a conversation doesn’t really address the actual point, does it?