YouTube viewers will soon have to sit through even longer ads, with Google rolling out new 30-second unskippable spots on a popular app.

  • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Those will not block YT ads.

    They’ll block ads at a DNS level, but YouTube ads are delivered directly into the video stream.

    • VibeSurgeon@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Those will not block YT ads.

      This is correct

      but YouTube ads are delivered directly into the video stream.

      This is false

        • VibeSurgeon@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          43 minutes ago

          Sure, but that can be said about almost anything.

          Still, I’d be surprised if they went the route of embedding ads into the stream, in part because of measurability/skipability/etc. It’s definitely not out of the question, but I think we’re still ways to go before we get there.

          And even then, tools like yt-dlp would probably be able to apply some heuristics to figure out which segments are foreign to the stream and slice them out that way. Blocking yt-dlp would require DRM, which in turn requires changing the transcoding pipeline in a pretty non-trivial way. I also doubt they would willingly go this route.

      • Scrollone@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        3 days ago

        And the reason is that those ad-blockers are based on DNS block lists, and YouTube ads are served by the same servers that also serve videos.

    • ragas@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 days ago

      Youtubes ads are not delivered into the videostream. That would mean reencodingevery video for every user and would need an insane amount of computing power.

      • diabetic_porcupine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        Why would you need to re encode when you can literally pause one stream swap in the ad and then swap back in the paused one in the same response

        • ragas@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          3 days ago

          Exactly. Instead of editing within the video stream you just switch to a second stream.

          However from youtubes perspective that has the downside that the switching logic is where adblockers can hook in to block the ads.

      • VibeSurgeon@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        That would mean reencodingevery video for every user and would need an insane amount of computing power.

        You actually don’t have to, on account of how adaptive video streaming works. It’s fully possible to serve a few segments of ad content mid-stream.