• wheezy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Is “regime” really a word that triggers people’s negativity?

      It’s funny. You google the definition and some AI summary gives me “associated with authoritarian” shit.

      But, I guess I’m old. Because Webster’s just has this:

      • form of government
      • government in power
      • period of rule
      • mode of rule or management

      It’s amazing how media can shape vocabulary and how people “feel” about specific words. And now we get AI summaries that just reinforce that same narrative. Literally redefining words to be associated negatively to better serve to build media narratives.

      I’d literally call any state a “regime”. It literally just means “a form of government”. But i guess it doesn’t anymore…

      • monkeyFromTheLake@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        There have always been different nuances that are carried by words with the same general meaning. An authoritarian government is still a government.

  • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    5 days ago

    Iran doesn’t allow foreign media into the country, so there is no independent verification.

    • GodlessCommie@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      This isn’t specific to Iran, this is how consent is manufactured

      And surely you are not implying that Western media, who are the ones using these tactics, is independent?