There’s also outlawry. Just render a person entirely unprotected by the laws of society. It’s tantamount to murder, but morally muddier.
But of course neither is politically feasible, for once you create a means to dispose of people who tick some box, your enemies will find some way to tick that box for you.
Kill the pedophiles is a typical fascist talking point. With „pedophiles“ of cause they mean everyone who’s differs from their concept of gender and sexuality.
Since you don’t seem to understand what I‘m talking about: FASCIST LOVE DRACONIC PUNISHMENTS BECAUSE IT GETS A SOCIETY USED TO VIOLENCE AND BRUTALITY.
They really love this because people slowly switch from: „Killing is wrong“ to „Killing a person for crime xy is probably beneficial to our society“ and then to: „If this person is killed, they probably did something to deserve this.“ (Which is something you can read everytime someone suffers from police violence.)
Don’t get me wrong: sexual encounters with people not able to (or below the age of) consent. Should have consequences, but those consequences can’t be violent. A functioning justice system should prevent (further) harm, not execute your personal want for revenge.
So either we kill 12-year-olds who have sexual encounters with other 12-year-olds. Or you realize that statements that start with KILL ALL aren’t a good basis for justice.
Kill. The word you’re looking for is kill. Kill the pedophiles.
There’s also outlawry. Just render a person entirely unprotected by the laws of society. It’s tantamount to murder, but morally muddier.
But of course neither is politically feasible, for once you create a means to dispose of people who tick some box, your enemies will find some way to tick that box for you.
This is exactly what I meant, the other two replies are just ignorant and unimaginative.
Oh you mean kinda like how the KKK worked for at least half a century?
A paramilitary terrorist organization that did the dirty work while sympathetic politicians looked the other way?
The extreme right wing’s literal worst nightmare is … having what they did, done to them.
I assure you its politically feasible, as I said, this was the operating norm for at least half a century.
Kill the pedophiles is a typical fascist talking point. With „pedophiles“ of cause they mean everyone who’s differs from their concept of gender and sexuality.
Ok, since you don’t seem to understand basic concepts, KILL ALL HUMANS WHO ENGAGE IN SEXUAL ENCOUNTERS WITH CHILDREN!!!
Since you don’t seem to understand what I‘m talking about: FASCIST LOVE DRACONIC PUNISHMENTS BECAUSE IT GETS A SOCIETY USED TO VIOLENCE AND BRUTALITY. They really love this because people slowly switch from: „Killing is wrong“ to „Killing a person for crime xy is probably beneficial to our society“ and then to: „If this person is killed, they probably did something to deserve this.“ (Which is something you can read everytime someone suffers from police violence.)
Don’t get me wrong: sexual encounters with people not able to (or below the age of) consent. Should have consequences, but those consequences can’t be violent. A functioning justice system should prevent (further) harm, not execute your personal want for revenge.
So either we kill 12-year-olds who have sexual encounters with other 12-year-olds. Or you realize that statements that start with KILL ALL aren’t a good basis for justice.
No genius, I would have said “unalive” if that was the case.