Like you, Contrapoints claimed she told others not to. Like you’ve been repeating all thread.
You keep claiming we agree, but unlike you I’m willing to say that harris was wrong to support genocide. You’ve already said that she supported genocide, so I’m starting to get the impression that you don’t think supporting genocide is wrong at all.
I’m starting to doubt this. Getting you to engage with the subject matter is like pulling teeth. You still have not responded to Briahna’s argument; you can’t even articulate what her argument is.
Harris was wrong to support genocide, and since you cannot admit that for some reason, you blame critics like Briahna for her loss.
And what about you? You voted, she didn’t. She told others not to. Who was right?
Like you, Contrapoints claimed she told others not to. Like you’ve been repeating all thread.
You keep claiming we agree, but unlike you I’m willing to say that harris was wrong to support genocide. You’ve already said that she supported genocide, so I’m starting to get the impression that you don’t think supporting genocide is wrong at all.
What do you think about Contrapoints claim? Is she wrong?
I’ve haven’t seen any evidence from either her or you that Briahna encouraged people to abstain from voting.
Now if you’re not going to even admit that genocide support is wrong, that tells me everything there has ever been about you as a person. Good day.
What do you think they were arguing about then? What do you think Briahna’s position is on voting in the general election?
I think you won’t say that genocide support is wrong.
I’m starting to doubt this. Getting you to engage with the subject matter is like pulling teeth. You still have not responded to Briahna’s argument; you can’t even articulate what her argument is.
Not as much as getting you to say that Harris supporting genocide was wrong
I’m talking to you, not her.
Is it a contractual obligation or something about how you refuse to say genocide support is wrong?