• Inucune@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    16 hours ago

    If a corporation is a person, it should have to apply for civil service and be subject to draft. Let me know if there are any other things a ‘person’ is subject to that should extend to a corporation as a person.

    • Inucune@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Oh! It should have a social security number and pay into social security and taxes as a ‘person’ in addition to any it pays as a corporation.

      It should have to carry health insurance for the corporate ‘person’ (let insurance companies have fun with that), or purchase it from the market like everyone else.

  • grimpy@lemmy.myserv.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    2 days ago

    As explained by More Perfect Union, the law, which is set to take effect next July, classifies corporations as “artificial persons” who do not have a constitutional right to make political donations.

    “The bill could limit the influence of super PACs,” noted More Perfect Union, “and be a model to challenge the influence of money in politics.”

    Democratic Hawaii state Sen. Jarrett Keohokalole, a supporter of the law, said on Thursday he was proud that Hawaii has become “the first state in the nation” to take direct action challenging Citizens United.

    • Whostosay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’ll be the first to say don’t let perfect get in the way of good, but God damn. We knew this legislation was a problem since the moment it was proposed. Even before that we wrote legislation that exluded it, on purpose, and it only came about through fucking weasel words and what not.

      Why has it taken this long to produce this, and why does it have to take effect after midterms?

          • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            How do you figure that? The GOP controlls everything right now. It would just get declared unconstitutional instantly.

            I don’t know how after the midterms would be better, but maybe they have a plan.

            Though really, it’s probably just that they can campaign on it better if it hasn’t been declared unconstitutional yet. I should stop letting myself believe they might be trying to accomplish something positive.

  • Malyca@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Unfortunately the traitors in the black robes have the final say here

    • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      The Judiciary has no way to enforce their decisions. As evidenced by the Trump Admin just ignoring court orders.

      Why are we just accepting the obviously corrupted court’s decisions at this point?

  • Asafum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 days ago

    I would love to hear MAGAs be forced to argue against this when they go all “biology/science expert” when it comes to trans issues.

    • NotEasyBeingGreen@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think their argument will be along the lines of saying that a corporation is just s group of people, so has rights of all of those people by proxy. I’m not sure what the answer will be if one then immediately asks about unions though…