Then it’s a paradigm and it can be worldview, ideology, prejudice, religion/“religion”, or formal-system.
ALL of those 5 reject the falsification of the paradigm they’re standing-within.
Hofstadter’s book “Godel Escher Bach” almost communicated that, but stopped short of identifying that it is paradigm, not formal-system or mind-regime: paradigm includes all-5.
& only a mind standing outside of a paradigm can honestly falsify that paradigm.
More interesting, though, are open-&-evolving worldviews, which are … dynamically-transforming-paradigms?
The more-universal the frame-of-reference, the better…
Yeah, there’s some truth in that…
Which is why I now define things this-way…
Then it’s a paradigm and it can be worldview, ideology, prejudice, religion/“religion”, or formal-system.
ALL of those 5 reject the falsification of the paradigm they’re standing-within.
Hofstadter’s book “Godel Escher Bach” almost communicated that, but stopped short of identifying that it is paradigm, not formal-system or mind-regime: paradigm includes all-5.
& only a mind standing outside of a paradigm can honestly falsify that paradigm.
More interesting, though, are open-&-evolving worldviews, which are … dynamically-transforming-paradigms?
The more-universal the frame-of-reference, the better…
_ /\ _