• vagrancyand@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    (Hint: voting 3rd party without changing how elections happen first is mathematically equivalent to throwing away your vote for the better of two evils and helping the worse evil. And there is very definitely a better and a worse.)

    Hint: this is incorrect in all possible mathematical ways.

    If 34% of any election goes to a third party, that third party will win FPTP. It takes that low of a percentage to win a majority.

    • davidgro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      And that simply isn’t going to happen. (Without at least one major party collapsing and not being on the ballot.)

      • vagrancyand@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 month ago

        Actually it would happen if every person who thought like you voted third party. Or, instead of courting either dem or republican voters, a third party targeted non-voters exclusively since they’re still the majority voting block.

        • fafferlicious@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          I mean this honestly, how do we understand what the issues of non voters are? Is there a consistent populace that never votes or is it a variable pool? Has it been shown that non voters care about entirely different issues than voters?

        • davidgro@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          It’s like that blue-or-red button thing that’s been going around.

          The critical mass of people willing to vote that way (and this assumes there’s only one 3rd party that everyone in question agrees is better) would have to exist first before they would be willing to vote that way.

          • vagrancyand@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            We’re more than a decade past that critical mass existing. No human being wanted to see Hillary Clinton in office. There were zero genuine supporters of hers amongst the working class. She was an awful human being during the Clinton years - literally the worst woman in US politics up to that point, on the same level as Margaret Thatcher.

            And absolutely no one really supported Donald Trump except as a protest to establishment politics. Trump 1 didn’t have the cult yet, and I think a lot of people forget that. He was just a clown outsider that was voted in as a protest against the ridiculous number of exact same ‘things’ in skin suits that participated in the RNC Primary, and their near exact counterpart that was Hilary Clinton.

            That’s why Donald Trump won the first time. He was the third party. Except he chose to run under the republican party banner because he knew he could guarantee 20% of Americans would vote for any Republican because of the work the party did in the 1970s and 80s becoming the party of American Christianity.

            Why did Harris fail? Because she promised to be Biden 2.0. Why did Biden win his first term but was projected to lose by the worst margins in US history for his second term? Because people wanted something different. Biden proved to be Donald Trump but quiet.

      • GodlessCommie@lemmy.worldOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        30 days ago

        It would happen if the public grew some proverbial balls and voted third party. It’s really that simple.