• atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    21 hours ago

    So you made an assumption and then instead of just asking me about it decided to be an asshole? Wow…

    • jtrek@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      More of an inference that an assumption, really. But go on. Did you read the article? Do you have any expertise on the subject?

      • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Yes. And yes. But you don’t want to talk about that it even says in the paragraph after the one you quoted that it didn’t work everywhere so what’s the point of even trying to talk to you?

    • hraegsvelmir@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Nobody said phonics is a perfect method, but against evidence showing it does substantially better at getting kids to learn how to read, you rocked up to contribute what amounts to “This is bullshit, because I didn’t like it as a kid.” We aren’t discussing how private tutors work, but how to get the public school system to get the best results in aggregate.

      Every kid learns differently, sure. But we can’t even staff schools at adequate levels to hold decent group instruction, much less provide tailored education for each student, so your reply about everything being wrong until every every child has their unique idiosyncrasies accounted for comes across as a bit daft in the context of the discussion.