• nosuchanon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Always has been.

      Wilson brought back the US Central Bank (aka the Fed). Andrew Jackson killed the bank to free us from their clutches.

      Nixon killed the gold standard so we could be the worlds central currency printing press and export inflation to the whole world and bully everyone into submission and extract their resources.

      Wall st finished the financialization and commoditization of everything on the world so they could own it and gamble with the future while everyone else pays the bill.

  • sunbeam60@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    6 days ago

    This is just hog wash.

    They are buying it for 60bn worth of SPCX Class A stock. This is Cursor’s board taking anything they can get for a company that has no future. Not a criticism against Cursor, but their market is standardising on Claude Code, and their value would rapidly head towards zero.

    Class A stock has no voting rights. This is the investors of Cursor literally saying “being on Musk’s train to the moon is literally better than whatever future we have right now”.

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 days ago

      True but they’re still making a bank and while the best exist was months ago the next best exit is now. I’d very happily take 60b worth of meme stock for a product with no future.

      • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        6 days ago

        It’s actually worth wayyy more. Microsoft already broke even just 2 years later (2016). It’s estimated they made 8.5B total since acquisition.

        Cursor will likely never make 8.5 billion let alone 60.

        • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          But Microsoft didn’t plan on that. They only bought Mojang because they needed to launder offshore money from Europe.

          In case you guys haven’t figured it out, Musk is just a tool of Wall Street, whether these companies make money or not is completely irrelevant.

    • k0e3@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      I kinda remember reading how the purchase of Macromedia by Adobe was like the biggest acquisition ever at 6 billion or so back in the late 2000s.

  • oyo@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    6 days ago

    And they’re about to buy Tesla for an ungodly sum, sweeping another failure under the rug, this time with every index fund holder bailing them out.

  • StitchInTime@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Perhaps I’m missing something, but isn’t Cursor simply a VSCode fork with some AI extensions integrated into it? Hate aside, what is the actual technical value of the product?

    • ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      7 days ago

      Early on in the AI game, before Vibe Coding was even a term, Cursor was the only tool that could connect VsCode to an AI model. Since then, there are now dozens of tools to do this for you. Cursor basically has no unique features, the only value it has as a company is an existing userbase and an established dev team. The worst part is that they are built on top of VSCode, which means their existence hinges on Microsoft benevolently sharing one of their most valuable products, and Microsoft has made several moves to try to kill the Cursor userbase and bring them back to VSCode.

      Cursor is one of the worst investments you could make right now. It’s surrounded on all sides by rivals trying to eat their lunch, and they have basically zero IP to protect their market advantage.

      • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        Even back then, copilot already existed if you didn’t mind choosing one of their models. Cursor was at most 2 months ahead in features, but already charging twice as much as copilot.

    • Johanno@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      While it is nowhere near the value Elon paid. It is a tool for easy coding with ai. Like the others thousands that out there. I mean spacex buying companies left and right at prices that make no sense is weird. Spacex being valued that much when all they do is burn money at a rate of several states is confusing.

      Elon getting richer by the second with all that nonsense is suspicious…

    • mysteryhumpf@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      7 days ago

      He is buying the users that cursor had. But these users can switch to another AI harness any day they wanted to.

    • Not_mikey@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      Haven’t used cursor but I assume it’s like other harnesses where the special sauce is in how it manages context, schedules sub agents, feeds them context, enforces standards, uses tools and skills etc. that make it better then just directly prompting the model.

      For example you prompt opus directly with “refactor the auth flow” and it’s going to try and “one shot” it and produce the code from that prompt. Whereas a harness has instructions to say

      1. Research the current implementation
      2. Search the web for standards
      3. Ask the user questions on how they want to do it …

      Which produces way better results

      • corbs132@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Claude code’s harness isn’t the best, but it’s still better than just promoting the model directly. One thing cursor has going for it is the vector embeddings of your codebase to make the harness more token efficient, but I still switched from cursor to managing parallel Claudes in cmux a few months ago and have had little reason to go back.

    • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      They don’t care at all about the vs code fork (probably his colossus data center with 89% vacancy can vibe code a clone in a few hours)

      They care about the subscribed users and how they can enshittify their experience by removing access to Claude opus and introducing grok the Nazi vibe coder

      • Prior_Industry@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Makes you wonder how sticky their product is though. I would just move to another product that has Claude if I suddenly had to use Grok.

        • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          imo not at all, like for the recent github copilot enshittification

          users will groan and complain for a month then move to a different VS code fork, one year later nobody would even be able to remember the shape of the icon

    • abc@suppo.fi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      They have their own model called Composer that’s specialized for coding.

      Personally, I think generic Opus 4.8 beats it, but it is quite cheap and fast. I used Composer via Cursor for a few months in late 2025. I hear they have improved the model somewhat since.

    • Tudsamfa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 days ago

      My cursor came free with my operating system, although I did have to buy my own mouse.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    6 days ago

    So the companies just get random values these days? It used to be that you actually had to generate some sort of profit before you were considered a valuable company.

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      I have my own business, so I just declared myself a billionaire. Now the government can send me billions in government contracts.

  • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 days ago

    They entered into an agreement to buy Cursor, with an expected time for the merger in Q3. It’s an all stock transaction, the number of shares that will depend on the SpaceX share price, to make up the 60 billion USD. Also they will pay in Class A shares (so the shitty ones with nearly no voting power)

  • VeryFrugal@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 days ago

    Very interesting. It doesn’t really make sense to “buy users” imo. Devs jump over to the current best offerings.

      • sanitation@lemmy.todayOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        We are looking into open router and kimi 2.7, mimo, glm 5.2 models.
        You can still use opus/sonnet models all the same, they are just wicked expensive.

        There are tools like opencode and kilocode for coding.

        • corbs132@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Have you tried composer-2.5? Supposedly it’s fast, decent, and far cheaper than sonnet.

          • sanitation@lemmy.todayOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            It’s based on kimi 2.5. but since then kimi 2.6 and 2.7 came out already. Yeah I’ve used it

        • SleeplessCityLights@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          I had to move to Kimi K2.6 because Claude models are too expensive to use. BYK from OpenRouter. I have not tested GLM models.

          As they stop subsidizing, everything is going to get more and more expensive until they price everyone out. If they are actually “selling shovels for a gold rush,” they are cooked. A lot of companies can’t afford to use Ai heavily anymore. Customers are going to dry up.

          • sanitation@lemmy.todayOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            Exactly. It’s hilarious just couple days back our ceo pulled 4 devs out and congratulated us on spending 2k a month each and apparently blowing company limit, I’m now tasked with finding alternatives hahaha. Definitely openrouter and kimi 2.7 and glm 5.2 are on my roadmap. I will need to do a presentation for ceo

            • SleeplessCityLights@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              I am surprised that anyone who can make decisions realized the June Ai bill was going to be crazy. I was betting it would take until July, when the crazy June bill is charged, for companies to realize they can’t afford frontier models.

  • Folstar@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Didn’t fElon already try buying his way to an AI company then ruined it by being who he is? [searching] Yeah, he bought talent to put together the stupidly named “xAI” to make the offensively wrong did-you-even-read-the-book “Grok” which after three short years is so bad it’s not even on most LLM performance charts. Who knows, maybe fElon’s pedo pal in the WH will take out Anthropic, Google will give up for no reason, and the Chinese will also give up for no reason. Then everyone on Earth will spend more money than they have on Grok. $22,000,000,000,000 in revenue, EZ PZ!

  • realitista@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    167
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Because all space companies need a social network and an ai coding company. It just makes sense. And your pension needs to buy this very logical company because it’s large enough to be in the index.

      • clifmo@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        SpaceX is an infrastructure company. Deeply dependent on government good will and contracts. It leases it’s data center compute to actual AI companies.

        • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          7 days ago

          They aren’t deeply dependent on government contracts anymore. Starlink will be able to support them. Government good will, id say yes.

          Starship is currently a money pit on the launch side, and will make or break that the company depending on if it works.

          Its leasing excess capacity, but that might not always be the case, but IMO that business model is probably better than the selling an LLM model one, but if you run out of people willing to lease it, youre still left with a pile of hardware you gotta do something with.

          If they stop leasing, xAI becomes a money pit too.

          • clifmo@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            7 days ago

            I agree. But suffice to say if NASA walks away from SpaceX because they fail to deliver, it’ll make an outsized dent to their perceived value.

            • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              7 days ago

              For sure, if something happened and NASA walks away, or reduces their interactions with SpaceX that will have ripple effects beyond what they currently provide.

      • mecen@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Isn’t the only part of company which is profitable space stuff?

        • abc@suppo.fi
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          29
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          This is the sort of comment where I wish Lemmy had the option to block everyone who upvoted it.

          edit and I wish the ones who downvote this also blocked me

          • realitista@lemmus.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            7 days ago

            “We do social media, rockets, and AI” Yes this company is a very logical well thought out entity who’s losing $3 for every $1 we make. We are growing only at 33% a year, yet are valued at 25x other companies with better growth and actual strategies . If you believe this shit I’ve got a bridge to sell you.

          • Eldritch@piefed.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 days ago

            The original Founders had a lot of good ideas and did a lot of hard work. Unfortunately they let a clown come in and take them over and turn everything into a circus. Where people can say that sort of thing 100% accurately now. Tesla and SpaceX are both punch lines realistically anymore as is Twitter.

            • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              6 days ago

              You realize Elon is the founder of SpaceX.

              The lead who designed the merlin engine turned down being a founder as he wanted a stable income vs the low pay and risk of working for equity/founder status, so he was an employee. (Edit and I don’t blame the guy for that choice either, odds of a private rocket company succeeding was incredibly low)

              SpaceX is not a punchline.

      • Test_Tickles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 days ago

        This truly is the weirdest timeline. The only division of this shit company that brings in any money is the space and rockets division. However, the technology divisions are a money pit.