• SaltyAmerican@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    8 days ago

    So you want everyone else to do the work and when that job is finished you will hop on our bandwagon and proclaim you always supported us?

    • gwl [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      It’s not “hopping on the bandwagon”, with the way your election system is rigged, there are only two options for a lot of places, anything else is a wasted vote

      If you got rid of the Electoral Colleges and the FPP then suddenly it’s not a wasted vote

      • SaltyAmerican@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 days ago

        And you know what changes first past the post? Democrats getting off their ass and voting for actual nondemocrat or socialist candidates. If they are pushed past the post by Democrats, then they win. It’s as simple as that. Trying to reform a party that is operating exactly as designed will always lead to failure

        • gwl [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          7 days ago

          No, all that will do is make republicans win in former Dem safehouses

          You woefully underestimate how much the deck is intentionally stacked against everyone but the big two

            • gwl [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              6 days ago

              Yes! Genius!

              Why has nobody thought of that before???

              Oh wait… they have. It was found to not work unless you’re in a “safe” voting block, and if you’re living anywhere with any amount of swing to it, you INSTEAD make the party you hate win.

                • gwl [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  Cool, but one is trying to destroy your rights quickly, putting people into camps, and treating LGBTQ as monsters.

                  one is trying to do it slowly, not putting people in camps, and it’s pretty chill with LGBTQ, which is better?

                  The latter!

    • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      You can be working towards voter reform and be voting for Democrats at the same time. They aren’t mutually exclusive.

      • SaltyAmerican@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        So your plan is to work towards voter reform while supporting the politicians that do not want voter reform?

        • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          7 days ago

          I’m sure some Democrats would like it, there’s people who run on that platform. It’s better than letting Republicans win at least.

          • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            I’m sure some Democrats would like it,

            They might claim to. They’ll find the no votes.

              • SaltyAmerican@lemmy.worldOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                6 days ago

                No, I’m a communist that sees your parties from the outside, their differences are superficial and their similarities are vast

                • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  “both sides bad” is such a juvenile take. It’s myopic. Yes, both sides are bad, but one side is clearly worse than the other. Not being able to handle that shows an inability to let go of binary thinking.

                  There’s a difference between a stubbed toe and a broken leg, and looking down on people who don’t want a broken leg and are trying to keep the “break everyone’s legs” party out of power is just dumb.

                  • SaltyAmerican@lemmy.worldOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    5 days ago

                    It’s liberals with the binary thinking. There are no 2 sides bad because the US is run by one oligarchy, and it’s bad. There is no good shade of fascism.