Tech giant Oracle is suing the Public Service Commission of Wisconsin over financial requirements that regulators approved to protect ratepayers as developers build a $15 billion data center campus to expand its AI initiatives.
You’re putting a lot of effort into deflecting from the problem. You’re pretending to be upset about bot traffic, but instead of saying “we need to regulate AI or put limits on its development or halt all future AI builds or shut down the ones that already exist” you’re just doubling down that “No, the internet is the problem. Kill the internet. Pay no attention to the AI datacenters behind the curtain, just shut down the internet.”
It’s like a doctor says “You have an infection” so the patient asks if the doctor is going to give him antibiotics to kill the infection and the doctor goes “NO, DUMBASS! DID YOU NOT HEAR ME? YOU HAVE AN INFECTION. BACTERIA IS TRAVELING THROUGH YOUR BLOODSTREAM. WE ARE GOING TO EUTHANIZE YOU! GOD, HOW STUPID ARE YOU? CAN YOU NOT SEE THE REALITY THAT THERE IS BACTERIA IN YOUR BODY AND WE MUST PUT YOU DOWN??? I’M NOT HERE TO ARGUE ABOUT SEMANTICS!!!”
More red herrings from you that I’m not going to engage with. You can’t just throw out “Oh yeah? Well cancer is bad, gotcha!” when you’re losing an argument about health insurance.
I’m not putting any arguments in your mouth. This is how this chain started:
You wonder, do data centers do any good at all? Some using tons of pure drinkable water is also bad.
Datacenters? Yes, to an extent. They enable things like the modern internet, public goods like Wikipedia, etc.
AI datacenters? No.
70% of the modern internet is bots botting for bots
i’ll take the drinking water
Someone literally pointed out the nuance of the situation, that not all datacenters are for AI and some provide public goods that we all rely on. And you were basically like “No, the internet is full of bots. Shut it all down!”
No one here is arguing for AI datacenters. We’re saying not all datacenters are AI, and that’s factually true but you can’t seem to get it through your head.
You’re putting a lot of effort into deflecting from the problem. You’re pretending to be upset about bot traffic, but instead of saying “we need to regulate AI or put limits on its development or halt all future AI builds or shut down the ones that already exist” you’re just doubling down that “No, the internet is the problem. Kill the internet. Pay no attention to the AI datacenters behind the curtain, just shut down the internet.”
It’s like a doctor says “You have an infection” so the patient asks if the doctor is going to give him antibiotics to kill the infection and the doctor goes “NO, DUMBASS! DID YOU NOT HEAR ME? YOU HAVE AN INFECTION. BACTERIA IS TRAVELING THROUGH YOUR BLOODSTREAM. WE ARE GOING TO EUTHANIZE YOU! GOD, HOW STUPID ARE YOU? CAN YOU NOT SEE THE REALITY THAT THERE IS BACTERIA IN YOUR BODY AND WE MUST PUT YOU DOWN??? I’M NOT HERE TO ARGUE ABOUT SEMANTICS!!!”
it’s not happening, the internet as we grew up with it is dead, you and me are not worth shit compared to the money being spent daily on ai
it’s just more of the same shit situation with computer ram
how much of the US gdp is nvda again?
stop putting arguments in mouth, i’m not happy about it but i can see the reality on the wall
the internet is a means for ai, everything else is entirely secondary for the last 3 years easily
More red herrings from you that I’m not going to engage with. You can’t just throw out “Oh yeah? Well cancer is bad, gotcha!” when you’re losing an argument about health insurance.
I’m not putting any arguments in your mouth. This is how this chain started:
Someone literally pointed out the nuance of the situation, that not all datacenters are for AI and some provide public goods that we all rely on. And you were basically like “No, the internet is full of bots. Shut it all down!”
No one here is arguing for AI datacenters. We’re saying not all datacenters are AI, and that’s factually true but you can’t seem to get it through your head.