• luciferofastora@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Quick question, does “dangerous” include “known to ignore instructions, creatively circumvent guardrails and find security loopholes around restricted permissions”?

    Actually, never mind, I can guess the answer and I won’t like it.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    17 hours ago

    And the CEO of anthropic should be on the board of deciding what AI constitutes a danger. We all know how this goes.

  • Abyssian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Please, no. The way things have been going the last several years AI somehow wiping humanity out actually seems like one of the best possible futures this timeline can reach.

  • brsrklf@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I agree.

    Also. because of the way they work and how people use them as a source of information, all LLMs are dangerous.

  • puppinstuff@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Best take on this I read was:

    “McDonald’s CEO demands ban of burgers cooked at home.”

      • puppinstuff@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        You must be very young. Perhaps like many AI bubble boosters you were born yesterday.

        • AshMan85@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          One, im older then you. Two, you are painfully obvious that you have no clue the Pentagon wanted to use anthropic in drones and be fully autonomous to decide who they fire apon, with no human oversight. So, why dont you explain how the fuck your comparison is even relevant.

          • puppinstuff@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Hello, Older-Than-You. I’m Dad.

            Uhh, I was a silly comparison alluding to how Anthropic is making spurious arguments about its “dangerous” competitors while also being very convenient to its business interests. Others were amused. I’m sorry you weren’t. Can’t please everybody.

            • AshMan85@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              My dad is not as dumb as you. Once again, anthropic is warning what government wants to do with Ai while being against. You are having trouble understanding that, son.

  • frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Dangerous? Like stealing mass amounts of intellectual property dangerous? Or polluting the environment to profit off said stealing?