• Sineljora@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    If you use starlink, you deserve far worse. 5g is usually sufficient unless you’re out in the ocean or something. Either way it’s ruining the night sky, making launches more dangerous, destroying the ozone layer we tried so hard to repair, and supporting death and fascism.

      • Greyghoster@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Fortunately in my area in Australia we have wireless broadband. There are small towers installed and operated by a local company that provide a good service. The whole lot of towers interconnect using microwave too so can span a large area. In any case, fibre isn’t coming to my place probably ever.

    • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      5G in rural America is terrible. I can’t make a phone call in my house, let alone get an internet connection. I’m not even in a particularly remote area.

      There are Starlink dishes everwhere you look here because it’s currently the only real option. It will probably be a while until they get some competition from Amazon.

        • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          14 hours ago

          The local ISP has been promising fiber for over a decade. They waited until Starlink took most of their customers before they started putting it in.

    • CountVon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 day ago

      destroying the ozone layer

      This made me ask “wait, is that true” and apparently it is. Super, skin cancer for everyone. 🤦

      • The_Decryptor@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        15 hours ago

        And it’ll take ages to have an impact too.

        Furthermore, we find that these reentry byproducts may take up to 30 years to settle from the top of the mesosphere into the stratospheric ozone layer. Upon reaching an altitude of about 40 km, aluminum oxides catalyze chlorine activation which promotes ozone depletion.

        So the “reentry byproducts” from a satellite re-entering now, won’t start breaking down ozone until 2056, and by then there will be another 30 years’ worth of byproducts deposited in the upper atmosphere.

        And since it’s a catalyst, it won’t even be consumed in the process like CFCs are.

        • Wioum@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          17 hours ago

          I wonder if wooden satellites would help. I don’t know how capable they are compared to normal ones, but it should reduce the amount of aluminium we launch into space.