I think this is excellent case where there is a difference between nato as an organisation and individual nato members. But i think that distinction can be very irrelevant, like in the eyes of the ‘other side’. Whether something is discussed on a nato level or a national level, those are the same military people making reports to the same politics people. But either all of nato or none of nato is involved, i think the last is technically more correct.
Nato was involved in the war. It was more behind the scene with inteligence and logistic.
I think this is excellent case where there is a difference between nato as an organisation and individual nato members. But i think that distinction can be very irrelevant, like in the eyes of the ‘other side’. Whether something is discussed on a nato level or a national level, those are the same military people making reports to the same politics people. But either all of nato or none of nato is involved, i think the last is technically more correct.