Would a damaged car somehow make this a justified killing?
Rhetorical question. I know how they argue: distract from the big thing, start bickering about little things. Get the DARVO in as soon and as loudly as possible.
No, but it makes their actions less defensible when A) there was not a threat large enough to warrant deadly force, and B) they lied to make it out that there was.
Would a damaged car somehow make this a justified killing?
Rhetorical question. I know how they argue: distract from the big thing, start bickering about little things. Get the DARVO in as soon and as loudly as possible.
No, but it makes their actions less defensible when A) there was not a threat large enough to warrant deadly force, and B) they lied to make it out that there was.