anti-anti-AI ≠ pro-AI, it assumes there’s only anti-AI and pro-AI and nothing in between.
And the wording was clearly about the anti-AI mob as opposed to people who understand the dangers and benefits of AI. It’s similar to the difference between a Gamer™ and a gamer.
That’s exactly how that works lmao. “Anti” means “opposite”, not some neutral third thing
anti-anti-AI ≠ pro-AI, it assumes there’s only anti-AI and pro-AI and nothing in between.
And the wording was clearly about the anti-AI mob as opposed to people who understand the dangers and benefits of AI. It’s similar to the difference between a Gamer™ and a gamer.
The user is not in between, they’re pro AI.
So? That has nothing to do with the argument at hand, it’s an ad hominem.
You think that a persons established pro-ai bias is not related to the inference of the bias of their ai-related comment?
I… disagree. That would be directly related.
And it’s of course not ad hominem in the slightest because an ad hominem is an attack on a person instead of an argument. That’s not happening here.
Your comment reads like a high schooler who just had their first class on argument and logic and hasn’t quite got a firm understanding of either yet.