inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 2 days agoTrump Makes Last-Minute Bid To Hide His Finances From BBCwww.forbes.comexternal-linkmessage-square99linkfedilinkarrow-up1632arrow-down12file-text
arrow-up1630arrow-down1external-linkTrump Makes Last-Minute Bid To Hide His Finances From BBCwww.forbes.cominclementimmigrant@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 2 days agomessage-square99linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareheavyboots@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up39·2 days agoGosh, it would be a shame if all his financial records got released without his consent. You know… like all the names and personal information of the Epstein victims.
minus-squareDanceMomsSavedMe@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up11·1 day agoThey will seal them all. Says in the court filings that even if released to BBC many can’t be made public. Because rich people are in charge of the United States so whatever they want goes.
minus-squareBlaestEgnen@feddit.dklinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 day agoIf they release them to the BBC, then it comes down to. Would the UK government want a rut with the US? It lowkey opens for blackmail, if they’re hiding smut on Trump and willingly gives them to the UK.
minus-squareohulancutash@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·19 hours agoWhy would the government be involved?
minus-squareZombie@feddit.uklinkfedilinkarrow-up2·18 hours agoThe BBC, despite its claims of editorial independence, ultimately serves at the pleasure of the government. It’s very naive to think that any politically significant information given to the BBC wouldn’t then be handed over to Lisa Nandy or MI5. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BBC#Governance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BBC_independence https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BBC#MI5_vetting_policy
Gosh, it would be a shame if all his financial records got released without his consent. You know… like all the names and personal information of the Epstein victims.
They will seal them all. Says in the court filings that even if released to BBC many can’t be made public.
Because rich people are in charge of the United States so whatever they want goes.
If they release them to the BBC, then it comes down to. Would the UK government want a rut with the US?
It lowkey opens for blackmail, if they’re hiding smut on Trump and willingly gives them to the UK.
Why would the government be involved?
The BBC, despite its claims of editorial independence, ultimately serves at the pleasure of the government.
It’s very naive to think that any politically significant information given to the BBC wouldn’t then be handed over to Lisa Nandy or MI5.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BBC#Governance
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BBC_independence
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BBC#MI5_vetting_policy