The country needs to find a “compromise” between privacy and safety, according to Flock Safety CEO Garrett Langley.
“When people talk about just one of these, privacy or safety, they’re prioritizing the wrong thing, and what we have to prioritize as a country is compromise,” Langley said during a recent interview with Fox News. “How do we have our safety, and how do we balance privacy?”
Ole Ben Franklin is particularly relevant here:
Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
In other words, Flock can go fuck themselves with a stiff wire brush.
What the fuck kind of compromise? “Let us technical loophole around your constitutional rights just a little bit?”
How about we compromise and let that guy in Tennessee hang you just a little bit.
I propose this compromise:
- No surveillance, at all.
- Flock rebrands to the shitty SaaS startup its name suggested it to be. I want to see the YouTube ads for “IrfanView, but paid and is a 500+MB chromium app”!
Compromise dez nuts
Fucking fascist.
Compromise: Quit now, and keep your head.
I like the whole “publicly hanged for treason” thing.
was about to make a similar post.
Stop with the invasive bullshit, or we start building guillotines.
Here’s my compromise: we give the Flock CEO twenty to life instead of sentencing him to public flaying like he deserves.
Im on board with this.
public flaying?
No, no… Blood Eagle.
Elect me your president and I’ll bring back tarring and feathering.
I don’t think it was ever official policy so technically in never went away. Tar just got really expensive
How about we don’t duplicate George Orwells 1984 irl?
Little bitch is negotiating, and it’s not even Halloween, yet.
Here’s a compromise: how about you fuck off?
That’s how you know the reasons behind flock is nefarious, when they have to scale back what they’re doing because of how blatantly obvious the overreach and invasion of privacy.
they give the data to palantir, they are pretty linked to gether.
The compromise is you scrap every camera, or we do.
Compromise offer: you stop spying on us and we’ll stop breaking your cameras.
Compromise: kill yourself
Take your cameras down and maybe people don’t want to destroy them. Good compromise, eh?
The more you learn about Flock, the scarier it gets. They have FULL profiles built on EVERY american that has flock cameras nearby. All your shopping, driving, financial habits are tracked. They know who all your friends and family are and how often you visit, they track your vehicles specific identifiable features like bumper damage, stickers, faded paint, etc. All of that is a complete violation of the 4th amendment and all these companies need to be sued.
Even deeper, they claim to be able to read “pet tags,” which would mean they can read ANY RFID, they know your gym code, if you have a fob for your apartment they can clone it and get in like a kid with a Flipper 0.
Idk how it’s physically possible so hopefully they’re lying, they should have to be basically touching the tag, but they claim they can. I’d believe they can read UHF RFID but that isn’t what they claimed, they specified “pet tags” (which again, would mean they can do all tags.) And that would mean they can add NFC and read your cards in your wallet, if they wanted, because that isn’t far off from RFID. Now ostensibly they’d have to perform the handshake with your card so they’d only have the same partial info a Flipper could pull, but like, still not a fan of that personally.
Source?
Before asking for a source for commonly known information, you should first demonstrate that you’ve done a modicum of searching yourself first.
I mostly agree, though the onus for proof is on the one making a claim. They could have provided a link to backup their claims.
