• Nouvellalia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      You really just replied to my comment saying that is insufficient, under an article saying that is insufficient, with ‘that is sufficient’?

      • MrTolkinghoen@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Um… What does blocking all internet access not prevent here? By isolated VLAN I mean isolated. I.e. fully blocked from internet access LAN local replies only. 0 WAN access.

        • adarza@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          if a device manufacturer is so hell bent on their devices phoning home that they’ll connect to an insecure wifi or a wifi network run by a ‘partner’ provider… they’re gonna be doing that whenever it can’t phone home via a configured network connection, too, and not just when there isn’t one set up.

        • Nouvellalia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          It doesn’t prevent exactly what my comment said it doesn’t prevent ‘an adversarial entity physically residing within the space’. If I showed up with a pi bristling with antennas, loaded with an unknown, encrypted payload, and plopped it into your living room, would you just hook it into a vlan and be like “there, now I’m safe”?