Calfpupa [she/her]

Which episode is this, this might get me into SG1

After rereviewing the interview and statement, I agree that even if this was an honest mistake, her retraction was not enough. She did not speak her implied two-state solution, which is unacceptable.

OP can you add her statement saying she misspoke?

I fumbled this line, plane and simple. To be clear, my foreign policy priority is ending Israel’s occupation, apartheid, and genocide in Palestine. I also reject the notion that anti-Zionism is antisemitism, and it’s important that we distinguish the two in order to combat actual antisemitism. I have always been opposed to any form of ethno-supremacy, and I refuse to vote for any of our tax dollars to go to any government that discriminates on that basis. I was being asked about rising antisemitism in this interview, and I was trying to say that my concern is while voters across the political spectrum wake up to Israel’s atrocities and our government’s complicity in it, the Democratic Party is failing to meet this moment. And when the Party refuses to lead morally on this issue, they are letting antisemites on the right co-opt the movement for Palestinian liberation while giving fodder to AIPAC talking points. But Sana is right, a movement for liberation must center the Palestinians being oppressed, occupied, and systematically exterminated — and the islamophobia and anti-Palestinian racism used to justify genocide is too often ignored. source

To be clear, this is not DSAs line, these are Democrat acting opportunistically within the electoralist faction of DSA.

Edit: She has made a statement saying she mispoke

I fumbled this line, plane and simple. To be clear, my foreign policy priority is ending Israel’s occupation, apartheid, and genocide in Palestine. I also reject the notion that anti-Zionism is antisemitism, and it’s important that we distinguish the two in order to combat actual antisemitism. I have always been opposed to any form of ethno-supremacy, and I refuse to vote for any of our tax dollars to go to any government that discriminates on that basis. I was being asked about rising antisemitism in this interview, and I was trying to say that my concern is while voters across the political spectrum wake up to Israel’s atrocities and our government’s complicity in it, the Democratic Party is failing to meet this moment. And when the Party refuses to lead morally on this issue, they are letting antisemites on the right co-opt the movement for Palestinian liberation while giving fodder to AIPAC talking points. But Sana is right, a movement for liberation must center the Palestinians being oppressed, occupied, and systematically exterminated — and the islamophobia and anti-Palestinian racism used to justify genocide is too often ignored. source

Despite being in DSA, she is explicitly speaking against DSAs ratified anti-Zionist line and in no way represents the org.

Edit: She has made a statement saying she mispoke

I fumbled this line, plane and simple. To be clear, my foreign policy priority is ending Israel’s occupation, apartheid, and genocide in Palestine. I also reject the notion that anti-Zionism is antisemitism, and it’s important that we distinguish the two in order to combat actual antisemitism. I have always been opposed to any form of ethno-supremacy, and I refuse to vote for any of our tax dollars to go to any government that discriminates on that basis. I was being asked about rising antisemitism in this interview, and I was trying to say that my concern is while voters across the political spectrum wake up to Israel’s atrocities and our government’s complicity in it, the Democratic Party is failing to meet this moment. And when the Party refuses to lead morally on this issue, they are letting antisemites on the right co-opt the movement for Palestinian liberation while giving fodder to AIPAC talking points. But Sana is right, a movement for liberation must center the Palestinians being oppressed, occupied, and systematically exterminated — and the islamophobia and anti-Palestinian racism used to justify genocide is too often ignored. source

That being said, she did not speak against her implied two-state solution and it’s still unacceptable.

You can get cars as late as 2016 for this

No, but when there’s a consistent sinophobic sentiment and people keep putting China in the title despite it not being in the title of article nor relevant to the subject…

No, Stalin was a dictator, and authoritarian (like all states are). You’re mixing up facism and authoritarianism maybe?

‘Fascism should rightly be called Corporatism, as it is the merger of corporate and government power.’ - Benito Mussolini, a founder of fascism.

Corporations only exist within the capitalist model

Fascism is a form of capitalism, aka corpratism

I’m transitioning

I doing my part

Give it to your friend first

You can fight people barely to the left of you

Why doesn’t he just teleport out?

I’m not arguing about morals, I’m saying you’re a dick for saying that all Americans deserve this when the group thats oppressing people is not being punished in any way. No one with any reason says were voting ourselves out of this except opportunistic right wingers. There are plenty of people fighting internally, but you dont hear about them because you only read americas main stream media propaganda compaign and celebrating while spitting on minorities.

What the fuck are you on about.

So you are saying that people in the minorities who are victims to the system are losers without know what they do.

Imagine calling a minority in america self victimizing losers and thinking you’re a decent individual.

So the victims deserve it, got it.