CorrectAlias

DeFlock is just a front end for OSM, does that make OSM a “terrorist organization” too?

This slop is why the curl maintainers had to turn off their bounty program.

Yeah, that was kind of my point

AWS is the real money maker for Amazon, making up most of their revenue.

Neither are the layoffs apparently

Other than AWS, which is basically impossible to avoid since they own most of the cloud market, the rest in that list are fairly simple to avoid.

Space is the worst place for high powered servers because of all the heat involved along with the inability to perform maintenance. It’s just a grift, it will not be profitable to put HPC GPUs in orbit.

I dropped it after the devs response was to be silent about what actually happened “to focus on the f-froid builds”. It’s still unclear, and because of the way they’ve set up the GitHub repo, it’s still possible for the apk to be compromised.

Just another grift.

Another person beat me to it, but it’s basically an open source app for wearables and other related devices. It aggregates all of my health metrics and made it so I never once had to connect my watch to Garmin’s cloud services. All of my data is just stored locally on my phone.

You can see the supported devices here: https://gadgetbridge.org/gadgets/

That swing is crazy

And you can only use infrared to radiate heat in orbit, which is the least efficient way to transfer heat.

Space is probably the worst place to have a data center for multiple reasons, the biggest reason being heat.

I bought a Garmin watch over Fitbit because it works with Gadgetbridge.

As someone from the PNW, I’ve ever understood why there were lines at Starbucks here. We have great local coffee stands on basically every block, and they’re typically way better and much cheaper.

Graphene can do two factor unlock which is nice.

I know, but it seemed like there was confusion about my intended point, which is that you should never expose it to the open internet. It wasn’t a question I really intended to be answered since I know that was their intention. My confusion is why do that when there are secure alternatives, some of which are easier than opening a port.

There are far better, more secure ways to do this. You could use a reverse proxy. You could use tailscale. You could use wireguard.

The last thing you should do is open Frigate’s port to the net.

I’m not sure why anyone would want to expose Frigate of all things to the open internet.

I didn’t say that they would stop, I said that it wouldn’t give them popular support.