If the second-to-last box at the bottom had an honest message from the company:
“Did you know you could do all this in a way that’s cheaper for us while we continue to charge you the same price that we keep raising inexplicably so that we make more money? Just go to w-w-w dot…”
Communism doesn’t mandate a single-party government though. Single-party government is just authoritarianism. That’s why there are, and have been, communist parties in democratic countries.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communism
“Communism (from Latin communis ‘common, universal’) is a political and economic ideology whose goal is the creation of a communist society, a socioeconomic order centered on common ownership of the means of production, distribution, and exchange that allocates products in society based on need. A communist society entails the absence of private property and social classes, and ultimately money and the state. Communism is a part of the broader socialist movement.”
By this definition, PRC is decidedly not communist as the common people do not own the means of production; products in society are not solely allocated based on need; private property exists; social classes exist; and money exists.
Whose definition of communism are you relying upon?
I’d be in favour of a law that prohibits illegal items in terms of service with some massive punishments associated to them. Something like 0.01% of total annual revenue per line item that is illegal per affected customer. You put a law like that into place and you’d find that terms of service would tighten up and become much more reasonable VERY quickly. The revenue gathered from such fines could fund an enforcement agency that receives complaints/reports to investigate and then starts proactively searching through existing terms of service for products. Pay bonuses to employees for each breach found to incentivise the proactive work that funds the agency. Long term it would be zero cost to the taxpayer and would enforce end users’ rights at the same time.