Had no idea Sabrina Carpenter publishes Franklin the Turtle books.

If that was the case, wouldn’t his lawyers have a better argument than “the cops gathered evidence wrong”?

There is wishful thinking, and our own biases about this case, but I feel like if the current story were true, we wouldn’t be splitting hairs about Miranda rights. And to be very clear, from what I understand,supreme court precedent, specifically New York v. Quarles, it has been already established that you don’t actually have to be read your Miranda rights if there is a public safety exception. I imagine that will be main counter argument.

Please correct me if I’m wrong, but this sounds like a weak argument from the people who have all the official details of the interaction and narrative they are pushing.