MerryJaneDoe

You can watch some videos on YouTube, if you really want to learn. It’s interesting, sometimes in a full-dystopian nightmare fuel kind of way. Yes, we are at the point where some of these robots can climb and jump.

It’s a gimmick, though, for sure. Just like human-mimicking androids are a gimmick. The money for robotics is in manufacturing.

But I’ll bet there will always be an obscenely wealthy person who is willing to pay for a cool looking robot prototype.

I think he’s just trying to further normalize the outsourcing/underpaying/devaluing of programmers.

Yes, objectively incorrect. I agree. That’s me. Please, sleep well tonight knowing that I stand corrected.

Ok. So it’s only the thousands of other elections affected by gerrymandering.

Poorly executed military action is 100% an American institution. We expect it - from the Bay of Pigs to “Mission Accomplished” in Iraq to the twenty year campaign in Afghanistan, our executive branch has a habit of making itself look incompetent.

But guess what? Nobody’s asking about Epstein, so VICTORY!

Shilling much lately?

It could be.

But I don’t see any other PC/laptop reviews by this author. He writes mostly about cybersecurity. And his Neo articles seem a bit…biased. Compare to his other articles, which are well-researched. Example:

https://www.csoonline.com/article/563017/wannacry-explained-a-perfect-ransomware-storm.html

My guess is either someone is posting articles in his name, or he’s taking a free Neo in return for a positive review.

1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerrymandering
2. Yeah, you do. The first amendment still applies.

I’m suspicious.

I’m seeing social media FLOODED with Neo content. Definitely not organic.

How could Trump win the election twice unless people were fine with his obvious malignant narcissism.

1. He could have rigged the election

2. It could be that anti-Trumpers are less likely to get off their ass and VOTE, while boomer MAGAs showed up in full force.

Just spinning ideas here…

I should not have used the phrase “everyone’s narratives”. I was referring more to tribalism.

So, for example, when we start analyzing the US-Iran hostilities, we can’t trust any narrative that comes out of either the US or Iran. Recently, a school was hit by a US missile and children died, it tugged my heartstrings. I felt outrage. But then someone pointed out that the report of dead children could be a psy-op by Iran. Ok, fair point. Time to withhold judgement and check other sources for more information. In this case, it seems that the report was tragically genuine.

Don’t they?

“You don’t need 100% of the people to love you. You need 10%, fuckin’ pissed. You have followers. I have soldiers.”

• Stormfront, The Boys (paraphrased)

This is kind of an insane take.

Women have always been vulnerable. Women are easy targets because they are, on average, physically weaker than males.

Women get raped and sexually assaulted at rates far beyond men. 50% of women will suffer a sexual assault of some kind in their life. Just 3% of men report a sexual assault.

it would probably also disproportionately affect poor Republicans

If MAGA thought that it would be a disadvantage to their voter base, they would not be pushing for it.

I don’t trust people to do this anymore.

What do you mean “anymore”? My whole point is that everything you are seeing is normal. The misdirection, the fake news, the corruption. It’s always been there. The difference today is that information travels much, much faster than it used to.

The only way to get to the truth is to listen to everyone’s bullshit narratives and try to pick out the grain of truth in each. This has always been the case, throughout human history.

This has always been the case. This is what America has always been. I’m honestly shocked that so many people are shocked.