• 0 Posts
  • 12 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 6th, 2024

help-circle





  • You are actually not wrong. I indeed have an axe to grind with a morally bankrupt shit stain of a media company that not only is a major source of desinformation and right to far-right propaganda for decades but also managed to buy enough formerly reputable publications to pretend that their agenda pushing is actual journalism.

    If you think that a media company known to lie and deceive (for a personal agenda, for the agenda of their investor or just directly for money) is not that big of a deal and we still need to take everything they publish at face value in case it is true for once or contains some traces of truth, that is very much your problem.

    Maybe you have time for this. The vast majority doesn’t have the time to fact check every single thing they read. And so they should indeed know when a publisher is generally trash, barely does anything without an explicit agenda, and rarely actually reports the truth (and only if it can be framed to fit their agenda).

    PS: Calling documented violations of basic journalistic code in a huge amount of different cases(*) "vague nothingness also is a definitive “you”-problem.

    (*) For reference: There is a German Press Council reprimanding severe violations in journalistic and ethical standards. Most publications manage to get 1 to a few over many decades of business, the worst examples of yellow press even get low double digits. And then there is just BILD (Axel Springer’s flagship rag in Germany) with ~300 or 30% of all reprimands ever published (more than 30 just in 2024). And their other publication run the exact same narratives, just dressed slightly more professionally looking for other audiences.




  • You listed just about anyone you can think of to be involved in your conspiracy.

    No, I listed a few of those Axel Springer SE is well documented to have already pushed propaganda for. In fact as I live in Germany I can read their lies in big red letters every morning on that rag displayed everywhere. So I sadly know how bad it really is…

    PS:

    “[…] claimed that Axel Springer SE, along with its subsidiaries, exhibits a pro-American stance, often omitting criticism of US foreign policy. This observation is then backed by allegations made by two former CIA officers in an interview with The Nation, claiming that Axel Springer received $7 million from the CIA”

    " As of 2001, the Axel Springer SE names “solidarity with the libertarian values of the United States of America” as one of its core principles on its website. This explicit stance has led to critiques from scholars and independent observers"

    “Foreign Policy has critiqued Axel Springer SE for a history of compromising journalistic ethics to support right-wing causes.”

    All quotes from the Wiki link you refused to click to imply conspiracy theories on my side instead.


  • Finally.

    No, that’s not happening.

    You are listening to lying propagandists here. The only actual question with Axel Springer SE always is are they lying for some of their own hateful agendas, for their fossil fuel promoting co-owners KKR (unlikely in this special case), getting paid again by the US, or just doing it out of their unwavering “solidarity with the libertarian values of the United States of America” (one of their core principle directly from their website…) because some of their MAGA supporting friends asked them nicely to create a distraction.

    (reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axel_Springer_SE)


  • Those “some” you mention are a miniscule minority.

    That official US government account posting from Israel while a big political delegation is there right now? Sure.

    Bigger numbers of very active MAGA influencers consistently posting from Russia or Nigeria? All those proud Irish “Celtic Warriors” posting from the US? Eastern European far-right politicians pushing Russian narratives and using Twitter through Russian apps? No, that’s a very obvious pattern.

    So while your first about a global society is technically correct, it is definitely not the defining portion in this. And stressing “that can happen and is totally normal” when it’s an exception has the sour aftertaste of a diversion.