• 0 Posts
  • 8 Comments
Joined 23 days ago
cake
Cake day: April 13th, 2026

help-circle

  • “This was unlike anything our team has ever experienced,” Nick Cocchi, the Hampden county sheriff, said of the incident, which was captured on video released by his office and posted to YouTube by MassLive.

    Oh, so let me get this straight: Six months of jail time for weaponizing apian assault on badge-wearing servants of capital, but absolutely zero consequences for the systemic, routine devastation of booting an 80-year-old cancer patient out of his house so some predatory lending vulture can liquidate his assets. The sheriff found the bee incident “unlike anything our team has ever experienced.” Yeah buddy, because you experience housing destruction so fucking regularly it doesn’t even register as anomalous anymore. It’s background radiation at this point. Just another Tuesday enforcing the financial rape of sick people. “We try to help people through difficult situations,” Cocchi said, while literally being the instrument of their most difficult situation. That’s some real I’m very sorry for this but I’m going to do it anyway energy. “We’re compassionate genocidalists” is basically what you’re saying. Rebecca Woods showed up with an actual physical manifestation of “NO” and the state’s response was to break her face into pavement and jail her for six months. But the eviction? Chef’s kiss. Totally cool, totally legal, totally normal. The fact that his statement treats getting swarmed by bees as the shocking aberration rather than, I dunno, the routine judicial destruction of someone’s life is just peak American law enforcement tunnel vision. You know what’s “unprecedented”? Actually giving a shit about the person you’re destroying. Woods failed, the guy lost his home, and everyone’s fine with that. That’s the part that should be “unlike anything we’ve experienced.“​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

    FUCK THESE PIGS

    FUCK THIS SYSTEM

    STING ALL THE FUCKING PIGS






  • “So, supposing we hit the body with a tremendous—whether it’s ultraviolet or just very powerful light, and I think you said that hasn’t been checked, but you’re going to test it. And then I said supposing you brought the light inside the body, which you can do either through the skin or in some other way, and I think you said you’re going to test that too. Sounds interesting.”

    “And then I see the disinfectant, where it knocks it out in a minute. One minute. And is there a way we can do something like that, by injection inside or almost a cleaning. Because you see it gets in the lungs and it does a tremendous number on the lungs. So it would be interesting to check that.”

    • Dr Jesus Trump

  • context:

    1. The Initial Promise

    When Ken Martin took over as DNC Chair in early 2025, he publicly committed to a transparent, deep-dive review of what went wrong in the 2024 cycle. The goal was to interview hundreds of staffers, volunteers, and voters across all 50 states to understand why the party lost ground with key demographics—specifically Latino voters, young people, and the working class.

    2. The Reversal

    In December 2025, Martin announced that the DNC would not be releasing the completed report to the public or the party’s rank-and-file. This move was a direct reversal of his earlier pledge of transparency. The DNC’s official rationale for the “mothballing” of the report was summed up in a now-widely quoted statement from Martin:

    “Here’s our North Star: does this help us win? If the answer is no, it’s a distraction from the core mission.”

    3. The Controversy

    The decision sparked significant backlash from grassroots organizers and party activists for several reasons:

    • Lack of Accountability: Critics argue that without a public accounting of errors, the party is destined to repeat them in the 2026 midterms.
    • The “Gaza Factor”: Reports and leaks suggested the autopsy found that the administration’s policy toward the conflict in Gaza and the high cost of living were major factors in voter alienation. Some believe the report was suppressed to avoid public “finger-pointing” on these sensitive issues.
    • Elitism vs. Grassroots: Many donors and volunteers felt that withholding the data they helped provide (through interviews and feedback) suggested the party leadership viewed the base on a “need-to-know” basis.

    4. Current Status

    As of early 2026, the report remains under seal. While Martin maintains that the party is “putting the learnings into motion” privately, the lack of a public document has left a vacuum that is currently being filled by third-party autopsies (such as those from RootsAction) and internal leaks, keeping the debate over the 2024 loss alive despite the DNC’s attempts to move on.