Yes, but actually no.
The bill of rights, i.e. first set of ammendments, are supposed to guarantee it. The framing of the original document did not include anything about our rights. Like - nothing at all what so fucking ever. Which kinda explains why those rights have been trampled all over by our own government so many times - they were an afterthought to market the main document to the masses.
Well, those fuckers captured the US government decades ago. Pretty much why the actual effect of actions taken by either party play out almost the same fucking way…
Removed by mod
…a counterpoint that this is not necessarily bloat. It’s debatable that this is the right tool to have this feature…
That’s called bloat.
Nuclear testing?
That’s it? That’s why you’re being such an arrogant prick?
Huh. You do you, I guess…
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Facebook specifically was aware that teenage girls were especially harmed by their algorithms, so naturally, instead of reducing that harm, they leaned into it.
You do have a point; anything they tried to put forth as an argument might very well get the lawyers involved censured, perhaps even disbarred.
Right?! Until there is substantial, and meaningful, reform, we’re still screwed.
An option they have been exercising a lot recently. Only to often get the case dismissed right away once they do manage to indict.
Removed by mod
Lol
A Republican will tell you they’re going to lower your taxes, then raise them; that they’re going to reduce government size to save you money, but it’s actually to make corruption easier and cost you more.
We could go on. We have no heroes in government, but fuck’s sake, man, one party are openly fascist.
But whatever. Go play on Truth* Social.
Removed by mod
And Republicans have a history of blatant lies; your argument is irrelevant, though.
Fully a third of the country is neither Republican or Democrat. THAT’S what decides elections, not how many are ‘red’ vs ‘blue’ (in fact, for many years now, Republicans are the minority, and by your logic would never win anywhere).
Again, your assertion that social media-based disinfo campaigns don’t do anything is just not true. Like at all.
Doesn’t change that she’s made a statement that she was coerced.
And, no way to know, so yeah I’m skeptical, too. Just the phrasing of your question made it sound like there was no info in the article.
Anyway, no worries - meant no disrespect!
Awesome, that asks for the info. Gotta try this out later; I don’t even have a large library, but the renaming is so tedious! But clicking through to identify each file that Jellyfin didn’t automatically identify is worse…
This post is related to the Epstein Files and why my name is in them. In 2012 I started dating a woman who was 30 years old.
It’s in the article…
Ugh. I was excited until I saw it’s for Windows. Doh!
Well, don’t forget “national security” has always been a euphemism for protecting the interests of the wealthy.
And let’s not forget the asinine claim about music composition. Yeah, this is a bullshit fluff piece to keep attention on AI.