

Yup. It’s crowdfunding the prosecution, by allowing anyone to bring civil lawsuits.
It also keeps it out of the criminal courts, because Texas specifically doesn’t want one state’s shield laws to try protecting someone from another state’s criminal prosecution. If that happens, the case would go straight to the SCOTUS because they have original jurisdiction in state-vs-state cases. And conservatives specifically don’t want a ruling like this to go in their favor, because it would open the floodgates for liberal states to criminally prosecute conservatives whenever they do something.
For instance, imagine California being able to prosecute an oil company for causing asthma because emissions blow across state lines. Being able to prosecute a gun manufacturer whenever a school shooting happens with weapons that were purchased legally in other states. Being able to prosecute a car manufacturer whenever a crash happens with an out-of-state driver. Texas specifically doesn’t want liberal states to be able to do this, so they want to avoid setting any kind of precedent with the SCOTUS.

Also, this section (and only this section) of the course was being taught by a an openly trans instructor. It’s a conduit for conservatives to fuel more anti-trans and “war on religion” propaganda.
“Look, the radical trans agenda is trying to erase the bible! War on Christians! They’re coming for your religion! You’ll be in a prison camp for your beliefs soon!”
If there is one thing Christians enjoy, it’s pretending to be persecuted while persecuting others.