

Thanks! Makes him even worse (doesn’t change whether I think it should be in this community though)


Thanks! Makes him even worse (doesn’t change whether I think it should be in this community though)


Yeah it’s happening on one instance. Nobody has to adhere his call, where is it btw?
It’s good to call that shit out now and then in right place, but instance moderation is still moderation.


It’s what used to be called fedi meta. This sub specifically says it’s not about grievances with moderation etc. This post is clearly about a moderation issue. One admin who also happens to be a dev is moderating poorly - sure, but not what this community is about.


Even if you ignore the slur, the frogs and the rune in the background: Building a chat network with proper e2ee in a few weeks doesn’t sound good. It’s clear this is made with LLMs and I wouldn’t trust it’s everyone nat all.


Here’s some offers on professional support: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/professional-services/issues


Yeah I like them as well, it’s what we use at work. The article doesn’t leave me optimistic though


It is but they’re working on federation for forgejo (which powers Codeberg).


If you don’t want to host something yourself, check codeberg


Lemmy is a small part of the fediverse and the tankie triad is a small part of Lemmy. Barely ever seen that stuff on Mastodon and co.


Switching to mbin won’t help you with that since it’s the same communities.


I don’t know, I’ve seen it several times mentioned in the Proxmox forum. I think it’s more of a theoretical scenario but it’s strongly advised against.


Gets annoying soon if you have more than one host. Easily automated with Ansible


You’re not supposed to run apt upgrade in Proxmox at all, it may even break your system. Use dist-upgrade.
https://pve.proxmox.com/pve-docs/chapter-sysadmin.html#system_software_updates


I think they know what they’re doing, bit of a troll. Framed like this in the article:
Various entities, including some with security teams, revised their judgment about what Forgejo is and isn’t, which was the main goal of the previous blogpost.


There’s a follow up by the author:
https://dustri.org/b/follow-up-to-carrot-disclosure-forgejo.html
Including this:
So I ended up sending and email to Forgejo security team, containing: an apology, a bit about my reasoning for proceeding with carrot disclosure, recommendations about what to harden/review, and a bunch of commented exploits/proof-of-concepts as attachment. We’ll see how it goes.
I have wireguard, it’s supported by my router (Fritzbox).


You’re right, I added a question mark.
Thanks for posting, what a wild ride.
Both is fine. Maintaining different datasets has the administrative overhead you mentioned, but can have security benefits, e.g. if you use different users in the different docker services and adjust the NFS permissions correspondingly. If service A gets hacked and escapes the container but doesn’t get privilege escalation, it can’t access the other services’ data.
This is independent of which version you choose, but check whether adding some storage to Proxmox is an option. Having TrueNAS as a runtime dependency for all your services can get annoying real quick.