Fabio's Lemmy
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
fne8w2ah@lemmy.world to science@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 days ago

500 Years Later, Scientists Prove That Leonardo da Vinci’s Bridge Design Works

www.popularmechanics.com

external-link
message-square
20
link
fedilink
219
external-link

500 Years Later, Scientists Prove That Leonardo da Vinci’s Bridge Design Works

www.popularmechanics.com

fne8w2ah@lemmy.world to science@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 days ago
message-square
20
link
fedilink
If accepted at the time, the design would have likely revolutionized architecture.
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    Scientists? You mean Civil Engineers?

    • HowAbt2day@futurology.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      5 days ago

      Doctors? You mean dentists?

      • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 days ago

        Why no, not like that.

        More like “doctors? You mean bio-chem researches”.

  • Nomecks@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    To construct it they would have had to build a support structure nearly a thousand feet long, across a river, that could take the weight of a masonry arch bridge nearly a thousand feet long until the keystones could be put in. Not hard to imagine why it got rejected.

    • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 days ago

      That was basically just the process of creating bridges back then, it’s not far off from how it works today…

      I don’t think that was an avoidable issue, you need to build temporary support structures while bridge building is in progress. In other words, if an extensive support structure is a deal breaker for you, it turns out you’re not building a bridge today.

      • Nomecks@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Sure, but think of the scale of what they would need and the technology they had. 1000 feet long and as tall as a ship, carrying a stone structure that would weigh probably hundreds or thousands of tons, across what I’d imagine was a pretty busy waterway.

  • TryingSomethingNew@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    5 days ago

    “This article is more than 24 years old”

    Still an awesome article if you’ve never read it.

    • Tithen@anarchist.nexus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      Am I missing something here? The article was posted in 2019

      • TryingSomethingNew@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        4 days ago

        I’m an shit! I was trying to find the actual bridge that has since been built, based on the design. I found an article on The Guardian from 2001 (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2001/nov/01/engineering.internationaleducationnews) , about the same work that was done. And I conflated the two because it’s a damn old article. Now, this one is from 6 years ago, which is still pretty old… but it’s a cool article

        • Tithen@anarchist.nexus
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 days ago

          Oh that’s awesome that a version of it got built! Thanks for sharing

      • Successful_Try543@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 days ago

        And the thesis is from 2019 too.

  • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    A bridge that doesn’t get built doesn’t work, so.

    • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 @pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 days ago

      “You can’t cross 100% of the bridges you don’t build.”

      • No_Eponym@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        I donno, pretty sure crossing 0 of 0 bridges is something I can manage.

        • Railcar8095@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          There are infinite bridges you didn’t build, unless you already did build infinity in which case I retract my comment.

          • No_Eponym@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Why would there be infinite possible bridges for me to build? There are only so many places where I would reasonable want to build a bridge. I also have a finite life, totally possible bridges are further limited.

            Besides, 100% of the bridges I didn’t build is 0, infinity doesn’t even come into the equation.

            Good try tough. I’m sure 60% of the time it works every time!

  • Hanrahan@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Ia this part of the 28 days later franxhise ? 500 years ago ? Was the bridge to contain zombies ?

  • altphoto@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 days ago

    3069: " hey look at that! The left leptomagnetic symbophone is just as Einstein said it would be! "

  • billwashere@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    I swear sometimes that da Vinci was a time traveler trolling the lot of us.

  • NegentropicBoy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 days ago

    The article: https://techxplore.com/news/2019-10-leonardo-da-vinci-bridge.html

science@lemmy.world

science@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !science@lemmy.world

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 240 users / day
  • 1.29K users / week
  • 2.22K users / month
  • 2.24K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 23K subscribers
  • 138 Posts
  • 397 Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • laverabe@lemmy.world
  • m3t00🌎@lemmy.world
  • Joleee@lemmy.world
  • DeadPand@midwest.social
  • laverabe@lemmy.zip
  • BE: 0.19.13
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org