Accepting that they believe in a religion is a slight difference in wording there. It’s not hard to understand. Bangladesh gets it.
I believe in religion X. Religion X has a magic guy in charge who dictates all acceptable behaviour. He literally defines unacceptable behaviour. Some people believe religion Y. Religion Y dictates different behaviour. Unacceptable. Religion Y is UNACCEPTABLE
But yeah, tolerance is a virtue. Unless someone’s intolerant, we can’t tolerate that.
I’m not being funny. Intolerance is the exception and needs to be shamed and destroyed.
Anyway ultimately, understanding someone’s wrong but giving them their due when it comes to free will is mostly nonsecular jam. Thats where most derive meaning.
And I’m not even secular jelly about that.
More simply. If youre taking a test, focus on your own paper. If youre peeking around and someone’s wrong, its their lesson not yours. And you might be fuckin wrong.
Unless someone’s intolerant, we can’t tolerate that
That and the Dutch.
That paradox is on display in this thread! People are telling me my beliefs would be wrong because my beliefs are that other people’s beliefs are wrong and you’re not allowed to believe that other people’s beliefs are wrong. But what if I only believe their beliefs are wrong because their beliefs discount other beliefs?
So much easier to ignore the whole lot of it and let people do what they want. I should probably stop replying in this thread now ha. Thanks for the friendly message. Peace!
Im not talking about your religion. You cna believe whatever you want. This discussion is about a survey people took about their beliefs, if you forgot already.
Accepting that they believe in a religion is a slight difference in wording there. It’s not hard to understand. Bangladesh gets it.
I believe in religion X. Religion X has a magic guy in charge who dictates all acceptable behaviour. He literally defines unacceptable behaviour. Some people believe religion Y. Religion Y dictates different behaviour. Unacceptable. Religion Y is UNACCEPTABLE
You have literally no idea how religions work and are talking out of your ass based on your prejudices. Good job making a fool of yourself.
How dare you decide how my hypothetical religion works
Theyre all hypothetical.
But yeah, tolerance is a virtue. Unless someone’s intolerant, we can’t tolerate that.
I’m not being funny. Intolerance is the exception and needs to be shamed and destroyed.
Anyway ultimately, understanding someone’s wrong but giving them their due when it comes to free will is mostly nonsecular jam. Thats where most derive meaning.
And I’m not even secular jelly about that.
More simply. If youre taking a test, focus on your own paper. If youre peeking around and someone’s wrong, its their lesson not yours. And you might be fuckin wrong.
Ok good luck and godspeed.
That and the Dutch.
That paradox is on display in this thread! People are telling me my beliefs would be wrong because my beliefs are that other people’s beliefs are wrong and you’re not allowed to believe that other people’s beliefs are wrong. But what if I only believe their beliefs are wrong because their beliefs discount other beliefs?
So much easier to ignore the whole lot of it and let people do what they want. I should probably stop replying in this thread now ha. Thanks for the friendly message. Peace!
I totally get where youre coming from.
Thats also not really a rebuttal or good faith reply.
But as youre tired, I reiterate its an emotionally responsible move.
Hahaha charitable to call me friendly, youre friendly yourself.
Sweet dreams
Im not talking about your religion. You cna believe whatever you want. This discussion is about a survey people took about their beliefs, if you forgot already.