• SpookyBogMonster@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Ok, I was making fun of you earlier, but now I’m genuinely interested.

    Explain to me why you think Democratic Kampuchea was a Socialist State, and I presume, didn’t actually commit a genocide.

    Because as far as I’ve ever been able to tell, pol pot apologia tends to be fairly flimsy, and be coming more from a place of defending China’s position after the Sino-Soviet split, rather than Cambodia itself.

    How about the Vietnamese-backed state of the People’s Republic of Kampuchea? Was it Socialist? Why or why not?

    • timdrake@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      There is no strict definition of a “socialist state.” DK was led by a communist party which set out concrete plans for developing a self-sufficient “socialist economy” and a “socialist culture” and was able to follow through on some of those in its short time. There is nothing that makes it “non-socialist” in comparison to other projects.

      I presume, didn’t actually commit a genocide

      You can presume that based on the fact that the allegation of genocide clearly violates the meaning of the word.

      How about the Vietnamese-backed state of the People’s Republic of Kampuchea? Was it Socialist?

      I don’t see why not.