

That’s an ideal solution. The best solution is what works immediately and within your capabilities.


That’s an ideal solution. The best solution is what works immediately and within your capabilities.


I mean, why do you think they are targeting women in the first place?


We can simply build the tech then throw the billionaires out.
We did that with the fediverse but the billionaires still control the online conversation.


You’ll be able to interact with your agent through any device, including your glasses to keep you present in the moment with the people you care about.
The guy still thinks his pervert glasses is a product we want. There isn’t a single original thought under that perm of his.


They do have billionaires, but they aren’t calling the shots. Just ask Jack Ma


But what is intelligence?
-every idiot who can’t tell the difference when they talk to a clanker


Putting aside assembly code gets compiled as well, the bottle neck is always validation of these systems. Making the systems more opaque makes the already difficult task of ensuring it works even harder.


More or less what happened to my former project manager.


“You mean you have to use your hands? That’s like a baby’s toy!”


To drum up a call for more money.


Like the mangrove forests in Africa and Asia. Scarcity is a feature, not a bug.


Sure you can make the technology more resilient but if the enforcement is punitive enough then it won’t matter.


I think https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molly_Ringwald but nothing in the bio makes the reference make sense


Unrecognizable without a smaller face.


To not do it would be silencing ideas which would make you just like his killer.


Well, there is their family members who either ignore them or make fun of them behind their backs.


Costs more than a couple cameras…


How many poor people flew on the Lolita express?
Turns out the only poor people on that plane were the victims.
Would you say women and men are targeted in equal proportions or that one group is targeted over the other based on “perceived value”? Like I am not saying you are wrong, I am just saying, “yes, and”