Wireguard is blocked in my country, so I no longer can use Tailscale or other Wireguard-based solutions. My home server is behind a NAT. What other ways of secure private connection can I use?

  • Evil_Incarnate@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Zerotier. They have their own protocol, and there’s a free tier that lets you connect up to ten machines to make a network.

    Also possible to selfhost, although I haven’t done it.

  • alienghic@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Can you set your NAT to port forward a port to your ssh host?

    I’m currently using yggdrasil to deal with this problem, though I’ve also used tor hidden services.

    • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      This is what I do. For best security practice, make sure to use public key authentication and disable password authentication so nobody can even try to guess your password.

  • iocase@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I haven’t tried it myself but I’ve been looking at NetBird.

    Elevator pitch page

    Maybe others who’ve used it or know more can chime in on if this is a good idea or not?

  • sandwichsaregood@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 day ago

    Sing-box is a VPN tool built to evade censorship https://github.com/SagerNet/sing-box . It is extremely resilient and stealthy.

    See also, xray and v2ray, which are similar, but in my experience sing-box is a bit better documented (at least in English) and has better maintained client apps.

    Setting any of these up can be complicated, but LLMs can get you pretty far if you have safe access.

  • measureyoucanpleasure@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Tor Hidden Services, easy to set up on the server side, can be annoying on the client side but HTTP and SSH are fine. Can be a bit slow but IMHO still usable.

    • xthexder@l.sw0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      Neat, I might have to set this up for myself. It sounds like it could get around some of the VPN blocking I’ve seen while traveling through airports.

  • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    https://github.com/erebe/wstunnel seems like the obvious solution.

    Or maybe OpenVPN over normal TLS on port 443.

    You could try to run Wireguard on a different port which would be otherwise used by some very common service, maybe there’s some general exemption for port 21, 22, 53, 80, 443…

    • shininghero@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      OpenVPN is my current method. Got it running on port 443 with user certificate authentication, and tls-crypt on top of that to completely mask the protocol from VPN detectors.

      Also technically prevents DoS attacks, but that wasn’t my primary goal.

  • black0ut@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 days ago

    OpenVPN in TCP mode wrapped around Stunnel. That’s the thing that works.

    I have it set up to bypass VPN restrictions in some networks, but it also serves to bypass a lot more stuff if you know what you’re doing.

    DPI will only see TLS traffic, and assume it’s HTTP. You can even try to fool it by modifying the packet headers, so dumb enough DPI will think you’re connecting to the site you choose.

    • purplemonkeymad@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      We have had success with this on port 443 and it appears to do a good job on networks that only allow browsing. Usual problems with TCP based VPN still apply.