• MyBrainHurts@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    4 days ago

    Well, out of the two of us, you either forgot about 2/3 of the last the last elections or chose to ignore then because you knew they disproved your point.

    And yes, the Senators is a weird thing but on the other hand, imagine how powerful progressive Senators could be if only progressives voted!

    Fwiw, the usual and more striking comparison for California and Canada is that California has almost as many people as all of Canada.

    • chloroken@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      1/3 primaries being bunk is not the W you think it is. I don’t know why you keep thinking it makes your cause look good. It makes your horseshit liberal electoral politics even more silly , which is actually impressive.

      • MyBrainHurts@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        4 days ago

        It’s almost like there was something wildly unusual about the last candidate… Oh right, usually a candidate doesn’t drop out right before the election.

        Goodness gracious.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          If that were an isolated incident, you might have a point. It’s part of a pattern of behavior in which the party interferes in its own primaries in favor of centrist candidates over progressive candidates.

          The party didn’t need to have its pledged superdelegates announce ahead of time that they were voting for Clinton. The party didn’t need to pass debate questions to Clinton. The party didn’t need to protect Henry Cuellar from a progressive challenger while failing to protect Cori Bush and Jamaal Bowman. The party didn’t need to oust David Hogg for getting new candidates involved in politics. The party didn’t need to sue as many candidates as it could off the ballot in 2024 so that Biden was the only name that appeared on the ballot in all 50 states. And the party didn’t need to make an endorsement in the primary for Maine’s second district. But it did.

          Blaming progressives for the results of a system that is deliberately manipulated to favor their opponents is just gloating.

          • MyBrainHurts@piefed.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            3 days ago

            There are almost never primaries for a successful President. In a wild, last minute situation…

            • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              There are almost never primaries for a successful President.

              So the party sued people off the ballots when it didn’t need to.

    • RedSeries (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Well, out of the two of us, you either forgot about 2/3 of the last the last elections or chose to ignore then because you knew they disproved your point.

      Says you.

      And yes, the Senators is a weird thing but on the other hand, imagine how powerful progressive Senators could be if only progressives voted!

      I’ll rally the progressive cattle that outnumber humans in Wyoming and travel to the great Mormon state of Utah and pitch my case, post-haste! /s

      Fwiw, the usual and more striking comparison for California and Canada is that California has almost as many people as all of Canada

      Which is why you should really reconsider how lacking your understanding is. I’m comparing states and provinces and the whole country of Canada can’t even match. You think California runs the federal government?

      • MyBrainHurts@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        Says you.

        ??? Okay, I’m so curious, what’s the third option? You didn’t forget the other elections, you didn’t neglect to mention them because they were counter to your point but instead…?