These “makeshift” structures are housing hardware that costs millions of dollars in total.

“Putting AI servers inside tents, officially called “rapid deployment structures,” is one of the more unique approaches to the AI build-out, Thomas said. They’re certainly not as sturdy as physical buildings made from steel and concrete, with one commenter comparing it to the “classic $10k racing bike with a $9 lock” situation.”

  • gnufuu@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Let the homeless move in and use the hardware as they see fit. They deserve dignity and epic LAN parties

  • heartSagan5@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Has there been an environmental study in these makeshift camps? If these were homeless, we’d placate drug use, bulldoze them to vacate the camps. What. The. Fuck.

  • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    9 hours ago

    jet engines

    AI

    How to burn endless amounts of fuel in order to make more noise than sense 😁

    • notgold@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Was thinking this too. They probably won’t even relocate them as it’s more efficient to put in the newest gear in their new facility

      • Dave.@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Yeah, probably won’t even dismantle it, just bulldoze this 10 billion dollars into a pit and bury the lot. Then go spend another 10 billion on a shiny new tent+compute

  • rynn@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Help me understand again how there isn’t enough wealth in this world to give everyone healthcare, shelter, and enough food not to starve?

    We are providing housing camps for AI infrastructure, and AI is nothing more than an idea. Meanwhile the suffering of all life on the planet just goes on because a few monkeys just decided this is the way?

    • notgold@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Homeless don’t earn the tech overlords money and they keep the general populace knowing where they could be. It’s bullshit that we give these cunts rope rather than just hanging them ourselves.

  • mavu@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    153
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Millions and Millions $$$ in hardware, all in light structures, in rural areas without much police presence you say?

    Interesting.

  • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Uses jet engines for power?

    Welp. Guess we know what happened to the old Spirit Airlines fleet.

    • mkwt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      It’s pretty common for natural gas electric plants to use Brayton cycle turbines, which is the same thermodynamic cycle that the turbojet engines on airplanes use. But you can optimize the designs on the ground for efficiency (and zero thrust) instead of thrust-to-weight.

      It’s also common to use “combined cycle” technology which mashes the Brayton cycle engine together with an older-style steam loop for extra efficiency.

      After reading the article, I think they’re just saying they installed some miniaturized natural gas plants. I don’t think they’re literally running aircraft engines on the ground.

      • AnyOldName3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        26 minutes ago

        There’s at least one company that does tweak (iirc used) airliner turbofans by taking the fan part off so they just have the turbojet (which is already tuned to mostly generate rotational energy to drive the fan turbine rather than produce thrust itself) and use that to spin a generator. Obviously, it’s a bit more complicated than that in reality, but there are quite a lot of old engines no longer certified for flight out of an abundance of caution but that still work fine, and a market for high-power generators that don’t need to be the pinnacle of efficiency (originally as backups just for occasional use, and now because of AI companies caring only about speed and not about cost).

    • untwistEmblem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      so much waste. why bother flying in your personal jet to burn the world down when you can just leave it idling on the ground?

      • blackbeans@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Not very common. Those engines are 50 years old and are only powered up a few times per year to stabilize the power grid as they can quickly scale up and down in contrast to nuclear, wind and solar.

        Most countries do not use them as they are only about 30% efficient and loud. A modern gas power plant can reach double that efficiency.